Literature DB >> 15176649

Population-based pharmacokinetics of the soluble TNFr etanercept: a clinical study in 43 patients with ankylosing spondylitis compared with post hoc data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

H Zhou1, M Buckwalter, J Boni, P Mayer, D Raible, J Wajdula, S Fatenejad, M Sanda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of etanercept in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a phase 3 study.
METHODS: Serum etanercept concentrations were analyzed from samples obtained at weeks 4 and 12 from 43 patients with AS (median age: 45 years; median body weight: 75 kg; white/non-white: 40/3; male/female: 34/9) receiving 25 mg subcutaneously twice weekly for 12 weeks. A population pharmacokinetics analysis using NONMEM was conducted to estimate individual etanercept pharmacokinetic parameters. Initially, appropriate base and covariate population pharmacokinetic models were built based on data from 10 prior clinical studies of etanercept administered subcutaneously or intravenously to healthy subjects (n = 53) and to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 212). The influence of demographic characteristics on the pharmacokinetics of etanercept was thoroughly evaluated. The stability of the final model was evaluated using both internal (bootstrapping) and external (data splitting) validation approaches. Finally, the selected final population covariate model was used to estimate the Bayesian pharmacokinetic parameters for the patients with AS.
RESULTS: The data from the 10 prior clinical studies were optimally fitted to a 2-compartment linear population covariate model. Both age (< 17 years) and body weight (< 60 kg) were found to be important covariates on clearance. Both bootstrapping and data splitting validated the population model. The mean Bayesian-predicted etanercept clearance and steady-state trough concentration were 0.072 l/h and 2,004 ng/ml, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters of etanercept in the patients with AS were similar to those observed in the patients with RA.
CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of etanercept in patients with AS were similar to those in patients with RA. The AS disease state does not appear to alter the disposition of etanercept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15176649     DOI: 10.5414/cpp42267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0946-1965            Impact factor:   1.366


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously administered etanercept in subjects with psoriasis.

Authors:  Ivan Nestorov; Ralph Zitnik; Todd DeVries; Arline M Nakanishi; Andrea Wang; Christopher Banfield
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Is there potential for therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  Carla Bastida; Virginia Ruíz; Mariona Pascal; Jordi Yagüe; Raimon Sanmartí; Dolors Soy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Etanercept: a review of its use in the management of ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Etanercept in the treatment of plaque psoriasis.

Authors:  Thao U Nguyen; John Koo
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2009-05-19

5.  Ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis: serum levels of TNF-α and Its soluble receptors during the course of therapy with etanercept and infliximab.

Authors:  Martin Schulz; Helmut Dotzlaw; Gunther Neeck
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Pediatric Dosing and Body Size in Biotherapeutics.

Authors:  Rong Shi; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 6.321

7.  GP2015, a proposed etanercept biosimilar: Pharmacokinetic similarity to its reference product and comparison of its autoinjector device with prefilled syringes.

Authors:  Oliver von Richter; Andrej Skerjanec; Miguel Afonso; Sabine Sanguino Heinrich; Johann Poetzl; Heike Woehling; Maria Velinova; Annelize Koch; Dmitrij Kollins; Lars Macke; Guido Wuerth
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.335

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.