Literature DB >> 15176176

Health technology assessment and priority setting for health policy in Sweden.

Per Carlsson1.   

Abstract

This article describes the development of health technology assessment (HTA) in Sweden, its influence on decision making, and its link with priority setting. Sweden has a well established governmental HTA body, the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU), and an increasing number of regional/local HTA organizations. HTA has had an impact on clinical practice and is used to some extent in policy decisions. Several initiatives have now been taken to develop processes for open priority setting of health-care services. With the establishment of a new agency to undertake reimbursement decisions on pharmaceuticals, and greater patient and public involvement in decision making, it seems inevitable that HTA will play a more important role in priority setting in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15176176     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462304000777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  12 in total

Review 1.  International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.

Authors:  Adrian R Levy; Craig Mitton; Karissa M Johnston; Brian Harrigan; Andrew H Briggs
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Study of large medical equipment allocation in Xuzhou.

Authors:  Chun-xia Miao; Lang Zhuo; Yu-ming Gu; Zhao-hui Qin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  [Health Technology Assessment--evaluating health care interventions].

Authors:  Claudia Wild; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

4.  Lean systems approaches to health technology assessment: a patient-focused alternative to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  John F P Bridges
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Mobinizadeh; Pouran Raeissi; Amir Ashkan Nasiripour; Alireza Olyaeemanesh; Seyed Jamaleddin Tabibi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-02-16

Review 6.  Health economic assessment: a methodological primer.

Authors:  Steven Simoens
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Economic Burden of Major Diseases in China in 2013.

Authors:  Xianyan Song; Lan Lan; Ting Zhou; Jin Yin; Qiong Meng
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-05-19

8.  Needs assessment in health research projects: a new approach to project management in iran.

Authors:  Niloofar Peykari; Parviz Owlia; Hossein Malekafzali; Mostafa Ghanei; Abdolreza Babamahmoodi; Shirin Djalalinia
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.429

9.  Comparison of hospital variation in acute myocardial infarction care and outcome between Sweden and United Kingdom: population based cohort study using nationwide clinical registries.

Authors:  Sheng-Chia Chung; Johan Sundström; Chris P Gale; Stefan James; John Deanfield; Lars Wallentin; Adam Timmis; Tomas Jernberg; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-08-07

10.  Acute myocardial infarction: a comparison of short-term survival in national outcome registries in Sweden and the UK.

Authors:  Sheng-Chia Chung; Rolf Gedeborg; Owen Nicholas; Stefan James; Anders Jeppsson; Charles Wolfe; Peter Heuschmann; Lars Wallentin; John Deanfield; Adam Timmis; Tomas Jernberg; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.