Literature DB >> 15175492

Assessing risk: the role of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) in patient safety improvement.

J Wreathall1, C Nemeth.   

Abstract

Morbidity and mortality due to "medical errors" compel better understanding of health care as a system. Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) has been used to assess the designs of high hazard, low risk systems such as commercial nuclear power plants and chemical manufacturing plants and is now being studied for its potential in the improvement of patient safety. PRA examines events that contribute to adverse outcomes through the use of event tree analysis and determines the likelihood of event occurrence through fault tree analysis. It complements tools already in use in patient safety such as failure modes and effects analyses (FMEAs) and root cause analyses (RCAs). PRA improves on RCA by taking account of the more complex causal interrelationships that are typical in health care. It also enables the analyst to examine potential solution effectiveness by direct graphical representations. However, PRA simplifies real world complexity by forcing binary conditions on events, and it lacks adequate probability data (although recent developments help to overcome these limitations). Its reliance on expert assessment calls for deep domain knowledge which has to come from research performed at the "sharp end" of acute care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15175492      PMCID: PMC1743824          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.13.3.206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  9 in total

Review 1.  Patient and facility safety in hemodialysis: opportunities and strategies to develop a culture of safety.

Authors:  Renee Garrick; Alan Kliger; Beth Stefanchik
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Sensemaking of patient safety risks and hazards.

Authors:  James B Battles; Nancy M Dixon; Robert J Borotkanics; Barbara Rabin-Fastmen; Harold S Kaplan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  A simulation framework for mapping risks in clinical processes: the case of in-patient transfers.

Authors:  Adam G Dunn; Mei-Sing Ong; Johanna I Westbrook; Farah Magrabi; Enrico Coiera; Wayne Wobcke
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Applying fault tree analysis to the prevention of wrong-site surgery.

Authors:  Zachary A Abecassis; Lisa M McElroy; Ronak M Patel; Rebeca Khorzad; Charles Carroll; Sanjay Mehrotra
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Risk assessment of pre-hospital trauma airway management by anaesthesiologists using the predictive Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Stephen J M Sollid; Hans Morten Lossius; Anders R Nakstad; Terje Aven; Eldar Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Multisite parent-centered risk assessment to reduce pediatric oral chemotherapy errors.

Authors:  Kathleen E Walsh; Kathleen M Mazor; Douglas Roblin; Colleen Biggins; Joann L Wagner; Kathleen Houlahan; Justin W Li; Christopher Keuker; Karen Wasilewski-Masker; Jennifer Donovan; Abir Kanaan; Saul N Weingart
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Measuring human-error probabilities in drug preparation: a pilot simulation study.

Authors:  P Garnerin; B Pellet-Meier; P Chopard; T Perneger; P Bonnabry
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Categorizing accident sequences in the external radiotherapy for risk analysis.

Authors:  Jonghyun Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2013-06-30

9.  Assessing the validity of prospective hazard analysis methods: a comparison of two techniques.

Authors:  Henry W W Potts; Janet E Anderson; Lacey Colligan; Paul Leach; Sheena Davis; Jon Berman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.