Literature DB >> 15175491

Effect of a scoring system and protocol for sedation on duration of patients' need for ventilator support in a surgical intensive care unit.

G Brattebø1, D Hofoss, H Flaatten, A K Muri, S Gjerde, P E Plsek.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: Need for improved sedation strategy for adults receiving ventilator support.
DESIGN: Observational study of effect of introduction of guidelines to improve the doctors' and nurses' performance. The project was a prospective improvement and was part of a national quality improvement collaborative. BACKGROUND AND
SETTING: A general mixed surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital; all doctors and nurses in the unit; all adult patients (>18 years) treated by intermittent positive pressure ventilation for more than 24 hours. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: Reduction in patients' mean time on a ventilator and length of stay in intensive care over a period of 11 months; anonymous reporting of critical incidents; staff perceptions of ease and of consequences of changes. STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: Multiple measures (protocol development, educational presentations, written guidelines, posters, flyers, emails, personal discussions, and continuous feedback) were tested, rapidly assessed, and adopted if beneficial. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: Mean ventilator time decreased by 2.1 days (95% confidence interval 0.7 to 3.6 days) from 7.4 days before intervention to 5.3 days after. Mean stay decreased by 1.0 day (-0.9 to 2.9 days) from 9.3 days to 8.3 days. No accidental extubations or other incidents were identified. LESSONS LEARNT: Relatively simple changes in sedation practice had significant effects on length of ventilator support. The change process was well received by the staff and increased their interest in identifying other areas for improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15175491      PMCID: PMC1743842          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.13.3.203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  13 in total

1.  Quality improvement methods in clinical medicine.

Authors:  P E Plsek
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Pragmatic science: accelerating the improvement of critical care.

Authors:  W A Brock; K Nolan; T Nolan
Journal:  New Horiz       Date:  1998-02

3.  Opioid use in chronic pain.

Authors:  H J McQuay
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  A D Brook; T S Ahrens; R Schaiff; D Prentice; G Sherman; W Shannon; M H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Results of a collaborative quality improvement program on outcomes and costs in a tertiary critical care unit.

Authors:  T P Clemmer; V J Spuhler; T A Oniki; S D Horn
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Intraperitoneal bupivacaine for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  B Mraović; T Jurisić; V Kogler-Majeric; A Sustic
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.105

7.  Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  J P Kress; A S Pohlman; M F O'Connor; J B Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The use of continuous i.v. sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  M H Kollef; N T Levy; T S Ahrens; R Schaiff; D Prentice; G Sherman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.

Authors:  J R Le Gall; S Lemeshow; F Saulnier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Optimal intravenous dosing strategies for sedatives and analgesics in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  J Barr; A Donner
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.598

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety.

Authors:  Daniel L Jackson; Clare W Proudfoot; Kimberley F Cann; Tim Walsh
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 2.  How Well Is Quality Improvement Described in the Perioperative Care Literature? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emma L Jones; Nicholas Lees; Graham Martin; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2016-05

3.  Comparison of sedation strategies for critically ill patients: a protocol for a systematic review incorporating network meta-analyses.

Authors:  Brian Hutton; Lisa D Burry; Salmaan Kanji; Sangeeta Mehta; Melanie Guenette; Claudio M Martin; Dean A Fergusson; Neill K Adhikari; Ingrid Egerod; David Williamson; Sharon Straus; David Moher; E Wesley Ely; Louise Rose
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-20

4.  Sedation in the intensive care setting.

Authors:  Christopher G Hughes; Stuart McGrane; Pratik P Pandharipande
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10-25

5.  Analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit: an overview of the issues.

Authors:  Curtis N Sessler; Wolfram Wilhelm
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  The Effect of Daily Sedation-Weaning Application on Morbidity and Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Authors:  Selcuk Kayir; Hulya Ulusoy; Guvenc Dogan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-01-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.