Literature DB >> 15175171

Natural variability and the influence of concurrent control values on the detection and interpretation of low-dose or weak endocrine toxicities.

John Ashby1, Helen Tinwell, Jenny Odum, Paul Lefevre.   

Abstract

While defining the no effect level for the 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor finasteride in the Hershberger assay, we encountered an inverted-U low-dose trophic effect on the prostate gland of the rat. Two attempts to confirm this observation were unsuccessful, and we concluded that the positive effect initially observed was associated with normal biologic variability. During the same period we attempted, unsuccessfully, to repeat our own observation of weak uterotrophic activity in the rat for the sunscreen 3-(4-methylbenzylidene)camphor (4MBC). Further evaluation led us to conclude that 4MBC is uterotrophic only when the control uterine weights are at the low end of their normally encountered range. This led us to reevaluate our earlier mouse uterotrophic assay data for bisphenol A (BPA). Originally we had concluded that BPA gave irreproducible evidence of weak uterotrophic activity, but upon ordering the eight experiments we had conducted, according to decreasing control uterine weight, we confirmed reproducible weak uterotrophic activity for BPA when the control uteri were at the low end of their normal range. In this article, we describe these observations, together with a reanalysis of the data associated with several reported instances of weak or low-dose endocrine effects that have proven difficult to confirm in independent laboratories. These include the activity of BPA on the CF1 mouse prostate; the activities of BPA, octylphenol, and nonylphenol on the rat testis; and the effect of polycarbonate caging on control mouse uterine weight. In all of these cases, variability among controls provides a major obstacle to data interpretation and confirmation. Our recommendations on experimental design are also presented, with a view to ending the current impasse on the reality, or otherwise, of low-dose or weak endocrine toxicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15175171      PMCID: PMC1242011          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  25 in total

1.  Uterotrophic activity of bisphenol A in the immature mouse.

Authors:  H Tinwell; R Joiner; I Pate; A Soames; J Foster; J Ashby
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Lack of effects for low dose levels of bisphenol A and diethylstilbestrol on the prostate gland of CF1 mice exposed in utero.

Authors:  J Ashby; H Tinwell; J Haseman
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Effect of rodent diets on the sexual development of the rat.

Authors:  J Odum; H Tinwell; K Jones; J P Van Miller; R L Joiner; G Tobin; H Kawasaki; R Deghenghi; J Ashby
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Maternal exposure to a low dose of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) suppressed the development of reproductive organs of male rats: dose-dependent increase of mRNA levels of 5alpha-reductase type 2 in contrast to decrease of androgen receptor in the pubertal ventral prostate.

Authors:  S Ohsako; Y Miyabara; N Nishimura; S Kurosawa; M Sakaue; R Ishimura; M Sato; K Takeda; Y Aoki; H Sone; C Tohyama; J Yonemoto
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Estrogen receptor-alpha knockout mice exhibit resistance to the developmental effects of neonatal diethylstilbestrol exposure on the female reproductive tract.

Authors:  J F Couse; D Dixon; M Yates; A B Moore; L Ma; R Maas; K S Korach
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Neonatal exposure of male rats to nonylphenol has no effect on the reproductive tract.

Authors:  J Odum; J Ashby
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  In vitro and in vivo estrogenicity of UV screens.

Authors:  M Schlumpf; B Cotton; M Conscience; V Haller; B Steinmann; W Lichtensteiger
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Comments on "In vitro and in vivo estrogenicity of UV screens".

Authors:  H M Bolt; C Guhe; G H Degen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Confirmation of uterotrophic activity of 3-(4-methylbenzylidine)camphor in the immature rat.

Authors:  Helen Tinwell; Paul A Lefevre; Graeme J Moffat; A Burns; Jenny Odum; T D Spurway; George Orphanides; John Ashby
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Strain differences in vaginal responses to the xenoestrogen bisphenol A.

Authors:  X Long; R Steinmetz; N Ben-Jonathan; A Caperell-Grant; P C Young; K P Nephew; R M Bigsby
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Small is useful in endocrine disrupter assessment--four key recommendations for aquatic invertebrate research.

Authors:  Thomas H Hutchinson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Arrhythmogenic effect of androgens on the rat heart.

Authors:  Mariana Argenziano; Gisela Tiscornia; Rosalia Moretta; Leonardo Casal; Constanza Potilinski; Carlos Amorena; Eduardo Garcia Gras
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 4.  Screening and testing for endocrine disruption in fish-biomarkers as "signposts," not "traffic lights," in risk assessment.

Authors:  Thomas H Hutchinson; Gerald T Ankley; Helmut Segner; Charles R Tyler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Comparison of study controls.

Authors:  Seiichiroh Ohsako; Chiharu Tohyama
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  The polybrominated diphenyl ether mixture DE-71 is mildly estrogenic.

Authors:  Minerva Mercado-Feliciano; Robert M Bigsby
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Does the prenatal bisphenol A exposure alter DNA methylation levels in the mouse hippocampus?: An analysis using a high-sensitivity methylome technique.

Authors:  Toshiki Aiba; Seiichiroh Ohsako; Toshiyuki Saito; Akiko Hayashi; Shinji Sato; Harunobu Yunokawa; Toru Maruyama; Wataru Fujibuchi
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2018-06-04

8.  Statistical power considerations show the endocrine disruptor low-dose issue in a new light.

Authors:  Martin Scholze; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Activity of xenoestrogens at nanomolar concentrations in the E-Screen assay.

Authors:  Elisabete Silva; Martin Scholze; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Key learnings from the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Tier 1 rodent uterotrophic and Hershberger assays.

Authors:  M Sue Marty; John C O'Connor
Journal:  Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2014-02-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.