Literature DB >> 15174127

Advances in the prediction of protein targeting signals.

Gisbert Schneider1, Uli Fechner.   

Abstract

Enlarged sets of reference data and special machine learning approaches have improved the accuracy of the prediction of protein subcellular localization. Recent approaches report over 95% correct predictions with low fractions of false-positives for secretory proteins. A clear trend is to develop specifically tailored organism- and organelle-specific prediction tools rather than using one general method. Focus of the review is on machine learning systems, highlighting four concepts: the artificial neural feed-forward network, the self-organizing map (SOM), the Hidden-Markov-Model (HMM), and the support vector machine (SVM).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15174127     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200300786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  34 in total

1.  A machine learning approach to identify hydrogenosomal proteins in Trichomonas vaginalis.

Authors:  David Burstein; Sven B Gould; Verena Zimorski; Thorsten Kloesges; Fuat Kiosse; Peter Major; William F Martin; Tal Pupko; Tal Dagan
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2011-12-02

2.  Experimental and statistical post-validation of positive example EST sequences carrying peroxisome targeting signals type 1 (PTS1).

Authors:  Thomas Lingner; Amr R A Kataya; Sigrun Reumann
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2012-02-01

3.  Combining machine learning and homology-based approaches to accurately predict subcellular localization in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Rakesh Kaundal; Reena Saini; Patrick X Zhao
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Application of the accurate mass and time tag approach to the proteome analysis of sub-cellular fractions obtained from Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1. Aerobic and photosynthetic cell cultures.

Authors:  Stephen J Callister; Miguel A Dominguez; Carrie D Nicora; Xiaohua Zeng; Christine L Tavano; Samuel Kaplan; Timothy J Donohue; Richard D Smith; Mary S Lipton
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  SOMMER: self-organising maps for education and research.

Authors:  Michael Schmuker; Florian Schwarte; André Brück; Ewgenij Proschak; Yusuf Tanrikulu; Alireza Givehchi; Kai Scheiffele; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Comparative Bioinformatics Analyses and Profiling of Lysosome-Related Organelle Proteomes.

Authors:  Zhang-Zhi Hu; Julio C Valencia; Hongzhan Huang; An Chi; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Vincent J Hearing; Ettore Appella; Cathy Wu
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 and Its Class B G Protein-Coupled Receptors: A Long March to Therapeutic Successes.

Authors:  Chris de Graaf; Dan Donnelly; Denise Wootten; Jesper Lau; Patrick M Sexton; Laurence J Miller; Jung-Mo Ahn; Jiayu Liao; Madeleine M Fletcher; Dehua Yang; Alastair J H Brown; Caihong Zhou; Jiejie Deng; Ming-Wei Wang
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 25.468

8.  Profiling of mitochondrial proteome in wheat roots.

Authors:  Da-Eun Kim; Swapan Kumar Roy; Abu Hena Mostafa Kamal; Kun Cho; Soo Jeong Kwon; Seong-Woo Cho; Chul-Soo Park; Jong-Soon Choi; Setsuko Komatsu; Moon-Soon Lee; Sun-Hee Woo
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 9.  Genome-scale models of bacterial metabolism: reconstruction and applications.

Authors:  Maxime Durot; Pierre-Yves Bourguignon; Vincent Schachter
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 16.408

10.  A comprehensive assessment of N-terminal signal peptides prediction methods.

Authors:  Khar Heng Choo; Tin Wee Tan; Shoba Ranganathan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.