Literature DB >> 15173798

An evaluation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after selective percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis.

Hiroaki Tsumura1, Toru Ichikawa, Eiso Hiyama, Tetsuya Kagawa, Masahiro Nishihara, Yoshiaki Murakami, Taijiro Sueda.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and usefulness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after selective percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in patients with severe acute cholecystitis and patients with acute cholecystitis and severe comorbid disease.
METHODS: According to whether percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage was performed before surgery, 133 patients with acute cholecystitis were divided into a percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage group (n=60) and non-percutaneous-transhepatic-gallbladder-drainage group (n=73). Background factors, safety, and postoperative course were retrospectively evaluated and compared between these two groups.
RESULTS: Compared with the non-percutaneous-transhepatic-gallbladder-drainage group, the percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage group was significantly older (p=0.0009), had a higher frequency of comorbid disease (p=0.0252), and a worse American Society of Anesthesiology classification (p=0.0021). In individual statistical tests, body temperature (p=0.0288), white blood cell count (p=0.0175), and C-reactive protein value (p=0.0022) were significantly elevated in the percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage group; however, for frequency of comorbid disease, body temperature, and white blood cell count, significance was removed by correction for multiple testing of data. There was no significant difference in gender distribution, history of upper abdominal surgery, or body mass index between the two groups. The duration of surgery was marginally but significantly longer in the percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage group (p=0.0414; in a single statistical test; however, that significance was removed by correction for the multiple testing of data). Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in blood loss at surgery, frequency of postoperative complications, rate of conversion to open laparotomy, interval until oral feeding was resumed, and length of postoperative hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that satisfactory outcomes can be achieved with selective pre-operative gallbladder drainage in older and sicker patients with acute cholecystitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15173798     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00456-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  12 in total

1.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Ji Hun Kim; Jeong Woon Kim; In Ho Jeong; Tae Yong Choi; Byung Moo Yoo; Jin Hong Kim; Myung Wook Kim; Wook Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Contemporary Management of Biliary Tract Infections.

Authors:  Josh George; John Baillie
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  Emergency Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage in Grade II Acute Cholecystitis Patients.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Gendi; Mohamed El-Shafei; Doaa Emara
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Better treatment strategies for patients with acute cholecystitis and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 3 or greater.

Authors:  Sung Su Yun; Dae Wook Hwang; Se Won Kim; Sang Hwan Park; Sang Jin Park; Dong Shick Lee; Hong Jin Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. A meta-analysis of results.

Authors:  Giuseppe Borzellino; Stefan Sauerland; Anna Maria Minicozzi; Giuseppe Verlato; Carlo Di Pietrantonj; Giovanni de Manzoni; Claudio Cordiano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Early percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and papillotomy treatment for severe gallstone associated acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Wenkui Yu; Weiqin Li; Zhiming Wang; Xianghong Ye; Ning Li; Jieshou Li
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage Versus Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shengbin Cai; Xianhua Ma
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Efficacy and safety of B-mode ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly and high-risk patients.

Authors:  Yi-Ren Hu; Jiang-Hua Pan; Xiao-Chun Tong; Ke-Qin Li; Sen-Rui Chen; Yi Huang
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  The Efficacy of Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage on Acute Cholecystitis in High-Risk Elderly Patients Based on the Tokyo Guidelines: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Qingqiang Ni; Dongbo Chen; Rui Xu; Dong Shang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.