Literature DB >> 15173738

Optimal timing of cardiac transplantation after ventricular assist device implantation.

James S Gammie1, Leah B Edwards, Bartley P Griffith, Richard N Pierson, Lana Tsao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the influence of the interval from ventricular assist device implantation to cardiac transplantation on end-organ function and posttransplantation survival.
METHODS: United Network for Organ Sharing data on 2692 heart transplantations performed in adult patients in the United States between October 1999 and March 2001 were reviewed.
RESULTS: Seventeen percent (466) of adult heart transplant recipients were bridged to transplantation with a ventricular assist device. Almost half of patients with ventricular assist devices undergoing transplantation were upgraded to status 1A as a result of ventricular assist device-related complications occurring more than 30 days after ventricular assist device implantation. Creatinine and total bilirubin levels were less in patients undergoing transplantation after 2 to 4 weeks of mechanical support. One-year survival was higher in the nonventricular assist device than in the ventricular assist device group (85.7% vs 79.7%, P =.0004). Within the ventricular assist device group, survival was lower for patients undergoing transplantation within 2 weeks of ventricular assist device implantation compared with those undergoing transplantation later (74.2% vs 84.2 %, P =.03). One-year survival among patients supported with a ventricular assist device for more than 30 days without complications was 91.4%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant independent effect of the time interval from ventricular assist device implantation to transplantation on posttransplantation mortality and suggested that a period of lowest risk might exist between 1 and 3 months after implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: Survival after cardiac transplantation is influenced by the time interval from ventricular assist device insertion to transplantation. Survival is significantly lower when performed within 2 to 4 weeks of ventricular assist device implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15173738     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

Review 1.  A ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery, decision making, or transplantation in patients with advanced cardiac failure.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Optimal timing of joint replacement using mathematical programming and stochastic programming models.

Authors:  Baruch Keren; Joseph S Pliskin
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2011-07-12

Review 3.  Left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Christopher T Holley; Laura Harvey; Ranjit John
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Ventricular assist devices or inotropic agents in status 1A patients? Survival analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing database.

Authors:  Curtis J Wozniak; Josef Stehlik; Bradley C Baird; Stephen H McKellar; Howard K Song; Stavros G Drakos; Craig H Selzman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Community support of patients with a left ventricular assist device: The Toronto General Hospital experience.

Authors:  J MacIver; H J Ross; D H Delgado; R J Cusimano; T M Yau; M Rodger; S Harwood; V Rao
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Optimal timing of same-admission orthotopic heart transplantation after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Gunsagar Gulati; David Ouyang; Richard Ha; Dipanjan Banerjee
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.