Literature DB >> 15173479

Timing of initial surfactant treatment for infants 23 to 29 weeks' gestation: is routine practice evidence based?

Jeffrey D Horbar1, Joseph H Carpenter, Jeffrey Buzas, Roger F Soll, Gautham Suresh, Michael B Bracken, Laura C Leviton, Paul E Plsek, John C Sinclair.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the timing of initial surfactant treatment for high-risk preterm infants in routine practice and compare these findings with evidence from randomized trials and published guidelines.
METHODS: Data from the Vermont Oxford Network Database for infants who were born from 1998 to 2000 and had birth weights 401 to 1500 g and gestational ages of 23 to 29 weeks were analyzed to determine the time after birth at which the initial dose of surfactant was administered. Multivariate models adjusting for clustering of cases within hospitals identified factors associated with surfactant administration and its timing. Evidence on surfactant timing from systematic reviews of randomized trials and from published guidelines was reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 47 608 eligible infants were cared for at 341 hospitals in North America that participated in the Vermont Oxford Network Database from 1998 to 2000. Seventy-nine percent of infants received surfactant treatment (77.6% in 1998, 79.4% in 1999, and 79.6% in 2000). Factors that increased the likelihood of surfactant treatment were outborn birth, lower gestational age, lower 1-minute Apgar score, male gender, white race, cesarean delivery, multiple birth, or birth later in the study period. The first dose of surfactant was administered at a median time after birth of 50 minutes (60 minutes in 1998, 51 minutes in 1999, and 42 minutes in 2000). Over the 3-year study period, inborn infants received their initial dose of surfactant earlier than outborn infants (median time: 43 minutes vs 79 minutes). Other factors associated with earlier administration of the initial surfactant dose were gestational age, lower 1-minute Apgar score, cesarean delivery, antenatal steroid treatment, multiple birth, and small size for gestational age. In 2000, 27% of infants received surfactant in the delivery room. There was wide variation among hospitals in the proportion of infants who received surfactant treatment in the delivery room (interquartile range: 0%-75%), in the median time of the initial surfactant dose (interquartile range: 20-90 minutes), and in the proportion of infants who received the first dose >2 hours after birth (interquartile range: 7%-34%). Six systematic reviews of randomized trials of surfactant timing were identified. No national guidelines addressing the timing of surfactant therapy were found.
CONCLUSION: Although the time after birth at which the first dose of surfactant is administered to infants 23 to 29 weeks' gestation decreased from 1998 to 2000, in 2000 many infants still received delayed treatment, and delivery room surfactant administration was not routinely practiced at most units. We conclude that there is a gap between evidence from randomized controlled trials that supports prophylactic or early surfactant administration and what is actually done in routine practice at many units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15173479     DOI: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  11 in total

Review 1.  Exogenous surfactant: intubated present, nebulized future?

Authors:  Shetal Shah
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 2.764

2.  Improvement in neonatal intensive care in Northern Ireland through sharing of audit data.

Authors:  J Jenkins; F Alderdice; E McCall
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-06

3.  More and earlier surfactant for preterm infants.

Authors:  J L Hughes; E McCall; F Alderdice; J Jenkins
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Bridging the gaps: getting evidence into practice.

Authors:  William McGuire; Peter W Fowlie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Collaborative quality improvement to promote evidence based surfactant for preterm infants: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Horbar; Joseph H Carpenter; Jeffrey Buzas; Roger F Soll; Gautham Suresh; Michael B Bracken; Laura C Leviton; Paul E Plsek; John C Sinclair
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-30

6.  Surfactant use for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome in three New York city hospitals: discordance of practice from a community clinician consensus standard.

Authors:  E A Howell; I Holzman; L C Kleinman; J Wang; M R Chassin
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filip Cools; Lisa M Askie; Martin Offringa
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 8.  Indications for and Risks of Noninvasive Respiratory Support.

Authors:  Kirsten Glaser; Clyde J Wright
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.035

9.  Prophylactic administration of surfactant in extremely premature infants.

Authors:  Lutz Koch; David Frommhold; Bernd Beedgen; Peter Ruef; Johannes Poeschl
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2010-06-07

10.  Assessment of surfactant use in preterm infants as a marker of neonatal intensive care unit quality.

Authors:  Heather C Kaplan; Scott A Lorch; Jennifer Pinto-Martin; Mary Putt; Jeffrey H Silber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.