OBJECTIVE: To describe the content of anticipatory guidance provided to parents of infants and toddlers and to identify primary areas of unmet need as reported by both parents and pediatricians. METHODS: Parent data were obtained from the National Survey of Early Childhood Health, a nationally representative sample of parents of 2068 US children aged 4 to 35 months. Pediatrician data were obtained from the Periodic Survey of Fellows, a national survey of members of the American Academy of Pediatrics. RESULTS: Parents and pediatricians tend to agree on the relative ranking of which topics are most frequently addressed. Parents and pediatricians both report that the traditional topics of preventive care--immunizations, feeding issues, and sleep patterns--are most frequently discussed, whereas topics that were more recently introduced into pediatric care related to developmental needs and family context are less commonly addressed. Parent-reported discussion of these topics include reading (discussed for 61% of children 19-35 months) and child care (discussed for 26% of children 19-35 months). Parent reports of some unmet need--defined as topics not discussed that the parent believes would have been helpful to them--affect 36% of children aged 4 to 9 months and 56% of children aged 10 to 35 months and are highest for the topics of discipline strategies and toilet training. Other specific areas of unmet need reported by at least 15% of parents are burn prevention, child care, reading, vocabulary development, and social development. Rates of unmet need vary with family characteristics and health system factors, including maternal education, race/ethnicity, and length of well-child visits. CONCLUSION: Parents and pediatricians report high rates of discussion on many topics that are critical to healthy development in the first years of life. They also identify areas of need that largely address health supervision on developmental topics. Findings indicate that additional research is needed to understand issues related to specific topic areas as well as the dynamics of personal and system factors that determine what is discussed.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the content of anticipatory guidance provided to parents of infants and toddlers and to identify primary areas of unmet need as reported by both parents and pediatricians. METHODS: Parent data were obtained from the National Survey of Early Childhood Health, a nationally representative sample of parents of 2068 US children aged 4 to 35 months. Pediatrician data were obtained from the Periodic Survey of Fellows, a national survey of members of the American Academy of Pediatrics. RESULTS: Parents and pediatricians tend to agree on the relative ranking of which topics are most frequently addressed. Parents and pediatricians both report that the traditional topics of preventive care--immunizations, feeding issues, and sleep patterns--are most frequently discussed, whereas topics that were more recently introduced into pediatric care related to developmental needs and family context are less commonly addressed. Parent-reported discussion of these topics include reading (discussed for 61% of children 19-35 months) and child care (discussed for 26% of children 19-35 months). Parent reports of some unmet need--defined as topics not discussed that the parent believes would have been helpful to them--affect 36% of children aged 4 to 9 months and 56% of children aged 10 to 35 months and are highest for the topics of discipline strategies and toilet training. Other specific areas of unmet need reported by at least 15% of parents are burn prevention, child care, reading, vocabulary development, and social development. Rates of unmet need vary with family characteristics and health system factors, including maternal education, race/ethnicity, and length of well-child visits. CONCLUSION: Parents and pediatricians report high rates of discussion on many topics that are critical to healthy development in the first years of life. They also identify areas of need that largely address health supervision on developmental topics. Findings indicate that additional research is needed to understand issues related to specific topic areas as well as the dynamics of personal and system factors that determine what is discussed.
Authors: Tumaini R Coker; Helen M DuPlessis; Ramona Davoudpour; Candice Moreno; Michael A Rodriguez; Paul J Chung Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Timothy I Morgenthaler; Janet B Croft; Leslie C Dort; Lauren D Loeding; Janet M Mullington; Sherene M Thomas Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Sarah Carsley; Cornelia M Borkhoff; Jonathon L Maguire; Catherine S Birken; Marina Khovratovich; Brian McCrindle; Colin Macarthur; Patricia C Parkin Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Susann Muehlhans; Max von Kleist; Tatiana Gretchukha; Martin Terhardt; Ulrich Fegeler; Wolfgang Maurer; Leila Namazova-Baranova; Gerhard Gaedicke; Alexander Baranov; Barbara Rath Journal: Paediatr Drugs Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 3.022