Literature DB >> 15173371

What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research.

P Wainwright1, J Saunders.   

Abstract

Local review of research by ethics committees in the UK has long been held to be an important right of the local research ethics committee and, even with the introduction of the European Clinical Trials Directive, the governance arrangements for research ethics committees continue to allow for local review of multicentre studies. There is no requirement for local review in either the European Union directive or in the guidelines on good clinical practice, and there is little evidence of it anywhere else in Europe. The idea that there can be "local", as opposed to "central" ethical issues in research is an interesting one, which raises important issues about the nature of research ethics and ethical review. The aim of this paper is to argue that there are no such things as local issues in research ethics, and suggest that those questions currently addressed as local issues properly belong within the research governance framework.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15173371      PMCID: PMC1733867          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.004051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  Time to face up to research misconduct.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-30
  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Frontline ethical issues in pediatric clinical research: ethical and regulatory aspects of seven current bottlenecks in pediatric clinical research.

Authors:  Wim Pinxten; Herman Nys; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Recommendations in relation to the EU clinical trials directive and medical research involving incapacitated adults.

Authors:  Kathleen Liddell; Erwin J O Kompanje; François Lemaire; Bozidar Vrhovac; David K Menon; Julian Bion; Douglas Chamberlain; Christian J Wiedermann; Christiane Druml
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Changes in the institutional review board submission process for multicenter research over 6 years.

Authors:  Monika Pogorzelska; Patricia W Stone; Elizabeth Gross Cohn; Elaine Larson
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.250

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.