Literature DB >> 15173032

Ultrasound strain imaging of altered myocardial stiffness: stunned versus infarcted reperfused myocardium.

Cristina Pislaru1, Charles J Bruce, Peter C Anagnostopoulos, Jill L Allen, James B Seward, Patricia A Pellikka, Erik L Ritman, James F Greenleaf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study we evaluate the diastolic deformation of ischemic/reperfused myocardium and relate this deformation to tissue elastic properties. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Farm pigs were subjected to left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion followed by reperfusion to create either stunning (n=12) or transmural myocardial infarction (n=12). Ultrasound-derived radial strain rates (SR) and strain were measured in the ischemic and remote walls. Myocardial stiffness was estimated from diastolic pressure-wall thickness relationship obtained from preload alterations. At reperfusion, end-systolic strain (epsilon(sys)) was significantly reduced in both stunned and infarcted walls compared with their remote walls (3+/-3% versus 26+/-2% and 1+/-0% versus 33+/-5%, respectively; P<0.0001) or baseline values. Diastolic passive deformation (epsilon(A)) and rates of deformation during early (E(SR)) and late (A(SR)) diastole were comparable between stunned and remote walls (epsilon(A): 7.3+/-1.6% versus 7.9+/-1.9%; E(SR): -2.7+/-0.4 s(-1) versus -2.6+/-0.5 s(-1); A(SR): -1.8+/-0.2 s(-1) versus -1.9+/-0.3 s(-1); P=NS for all) but were of significantly lower magnitude in infarcted walls versus remote walls (epsilon(A): 1.1+/-0.2% versus 11.4+/-1.9%; E(SR): -0.3+/-0.1 s(-1) versus -2.4+/-0.4 s(-1); A(SR): -0.3+/-0.1 s(-1) versus -2.5+/-0.4 s(-1); P<0.0001 for all). Stiffness coefficient of exponential diastolic pressure-wall thickness relation was higher for infarcted (P<0.05) but not for stunned walls (P=NS) compared with their remote walls.
CONCLUSIONS: Early after postischemic reperfusion and in the presence of severely reduced systolic deformation, diastolic passive deformation (and rates of deformation) can distinguish stiff, noncompliant, transmurally infarcted myocardial walls from those more compliant walls containing viable but stunned myocardium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15173032     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000129311.73402.EF

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  26 in total

1.  In vivo assessment of myocardial stiffness with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging.

Authors:  Stephen J Hsu; Richard R Bouchard; Douglas M Dumont; Patrick D Wolf; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Incorporation of a left ventricle finite element model defining infarction into the XCAT imaging phantom.

Authors:  Alexander I Veress; W Paul Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui; Grant T Gullberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction - unwinding the diagnosis mystique.

Authors:  Muhammad Asrar Ul Haq; Vivek Mutha; Nima Rudd; David L Hare; Chiew Wong
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2014-10-11

4.  Effects of subacute dietary salt intake and acute volume expansion on diastolic function in young normotensive individuals.

Authors:  Gary S Mak; Heloisa Sawaya; Abigail May Khan; Pankaj Arora; Andrew Martinez; Allicia Ryan; Laura Ernande; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Thomas J Wang; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Temporal deformation pattern in acute and late phases of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: incremental value of longitudinal post-systolic strain to assess myocardial viability.

Authors:  Olivier Huttin; Pierre-Yves Marie; Maxime Benichou; Erwan Bozec; Simon Lemoine; Damien Mandry; Yves Juillière; Nicolas Sadoul; Emilien Micard; Kevin Duarte; Marine Beaumont; Patrick Rossignol; Nicolas Girerd; Christine Selton-Suty
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Stress echocardiography: diastole to the rescue.

Authors:  Theodore P Abraham; Hsin-Yueh Liang
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Viscoelastic properties of normal and infarcted myocardium measured by a multifrequency shear wave method: comparison with pressure-segment length method.

Authors:  Cristina Pislaru; Matthew W Urban; Sorin V Pislaru; Randall R Kinnick; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  In Vivo Open- and Closed-chest Measurements of Left-Ventricular Myocardial Viscoelasticity using Lamb wave Dispersion Ultrasound Vibrometry (LDUV): A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Ivan Z Nenadic; Matthew W Urban; Cristina Pislaru; Daniel Escobar; Luiz Vasconcelos; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2018-04-30

9.  Measurement of viscoelastic properties of in vivo swine myocardium using lamb wave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (LDUV).

Authors:  Matthew W Urban; Cristina Pislaru; Ivan Z Nenadic; Randall R Kinnick; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Magnetic resonance elastography: Inversions in bounded media.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; Kiaran P McGee; Armando Manduca; Anthony J Romano; Kevin J Glaser; Philip A Araoz; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.