Literature DB >> 15173022

Clinical and angiographic predictors of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Prevention of Restenosis With Tranilast and Its Outcomes (PRESTO) trial.

Mandeep Singh1, Bernard J Gersh, Robyn L McClelland, Kalon K L Ho, James T Willerson, William F Penny, David R Holmes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restenosis prediction from published studies is hampered by inadequate sample size and incomplete angiographic follow-up. The prediction of restenosis with the existing variables is poor. The aim of the present study was to include the clinical and angiographic variables commonly associated with angiographic restenosis and develop a prediction model for restenosis from the PRESTO database. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This study included 1312 patients with a single lesion enrolled in the angiographic substudy of the PRESTO trial. We constructed 2 risk scores. The first used preprocedural variables (female gender, vessel size [< or =2.5 mm, 2.5 to 3 mm, 3 to 3.5 mm, 3.5 to 4 mm, >4 mm], lesion length >20 mm, diabetes, smoking status, type C lesion, any previous percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], and unstable angina) derived from previous studies. Estimated restenosis rates and corresponding variability for each possible level of the resultant risk score were obtained via bootstrapping techniques. The area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.63, indicating modest discriminatory ability to predict restenosis. The second approach constructed a multiple logistic regression model considering significant univariate clinical and angiographic predictors of restenosis identified from the PRESTO database (treated diabetes mellitus, nonsmoker, vessel size, lesion length, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type C lesion, ostial location, and previous PCI). The area under the ROC curve for this risk score was also 0.63.
CONCLUSIONS: The preprocedural clinical and angiographic variables from available studies and from the PRESTO trial have only modest predictive ability for restenosis after PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15173022     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000131898.18849.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  17 in total

1.  Incidence and predictors of target lesion failure in patients undergoing contemporary DES implantation-Individual patient data pooled analysis from 6 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Maayan Konigstein; Mahesh V Madhavan; Ori Ben-Yehuda; Hussein M Rahim; Iva Srdanovic; Fotis Gkargkoulas; Ghazaleh Mehdipoor; Evan Shlofmitz; Akiko Maehara; Björn Redfors; Ankita K Gore; Thomas McAndrew; Gregg W Stone; Ziad A Ali
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Postoperative care and follow-up after coronary stenting.

Authors:  Tienush Rassaf; Stephan Steiner; Malte Kelm
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Restenosis after PCI. Part 1: pathophysiology and risk factors.

Authors:  J Wouter Jukema; Jeffrey J W Verschuren; Tarek A N Ahmed; Paul H A Quax
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Clinical presentation and predictors of target vessel revascularization after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Hazem Al Muradi; Aditya Mehra; Joseph Okolo; Helen Vlachos; Faith Selzer; Oscar C Marroquin; Kimberly Skelding; Elizabeth M Holper; David O Williams; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec

5.  Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for treatment of bare-metal in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Inder M Singh; Steven J Filby; Fredy El Sakr; Eiran Z Gorodeski; A Michael Lincoff; Stephen G Ellis; Mehdi H Shishehbor
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: Predictors and Treatment.

Authors:  Helen Ullrich; Maximilian Olschewski; Thomas Münzel; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 8.251

7.  Predicting target vessel revascularization in older patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era.

Authors:  Connie N Hess; Sunil V Rao; David Dai; Megan L Neely; Robert N Piana; John C Messenger; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 8.  Current concepts on coronary revascularization using BRS in patients with diabetes and small vessels disease.

Authors:  Giulia Masiero; Marco Mojoli; Daisuke Ueshima; Giuseppe Tarantini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Adenosine triphosphate stress 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile gated myocardial perfusion imaging efficacy in diagnosing stent restenosis following coronary stent implantation.

Authors:  Pengfei Zhang; Song Chen; Yang Li; Qiuhong Du; Lijuan Wang; Yingxian Sun; Yaming Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Identification of independent risk factors for restenosis following bare-metal stent implantation: Role of bare-metal stents in the era of drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Chang-Bum Park; Hoon-Ki Park
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.