Literature DB >> 15172859

Glucose screening in Mexican-American women.

Yariv Yogev1, Oded Langer, Elly M J Xenakis, Barak Rosenn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the predictive value for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using different glucose challenge test thresholds in Mexican-American women.
METHODS: A prospective population-based study of 6,857 gravid women, who were tested with a 50-g glucose challenge test at 24-28 weeks of gestation, was performed. A screening value of 130 mg/dL or greater was followed by a 3-hour, 100-g oral glucose tolerance test. Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed by 2 or more abnormal values using the Carpenter and Coustan criteria. For purpose of analysis, GDM diagnosis was categorized with glucose challenge test values in 10-mg/dL increments. A comparison between Carpenter-Coustan and the National Diabetic Data Group criteria for GDM diagnosis was performed for each glucose challenge test threshold category. Sensitivity and specificity for GDM diagnosis were further calculated for different glucose challenge test thresholds (130, 135, and 140 mg/dL).
RESULTS: Overall, GDM was diagnosed in 469 of 6,857 (6.8%) women, and one abnormal oral glucose tolerance test value was tested in 351 of 6,857 women (5.1%). Normal glucose challenge test results (threshold less than 130 mg/dL) were obtained in 4,316 of 6,857 women. An elevated glucose challenge test value increases the risk of GDM, but even in high glucose challenge test thresholds (more than 180 mg/dL), the predictive value for GDM was only 50%. The sensitivity and specificity for GDM diagnosis using 3 different glucose challenge test thresholds were as follows: threshold 130 mg/dL or more: 97% and 63%; threshold 135 mg/dL or more: 91% and 73%; and threshold 140 mg/dL or more: 85% and 78%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Data suggests that an elevated glucose challenge test level cannot be used as a single diagnostic tool for GDM even in high test thresholds. A threshold of 130 mg/dL may be recommended as a screening threshold for GDM in Mexican-American women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15172859     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124781.98059.fe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

Review 1.  The increasing prevalence of diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Kelly J Hunt; Kelly L Schuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Incidence of diabetes mellitus at postpartum six to twelve months following the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ozlem Seçilmiş Kerimoğlu; Serdar Yalvaç; Deniz Karçaaltınçaba; Omer Kandemir
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2010-06-01

3.  Risk assessment does not explain high prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in a large group of Sardinian women.

Authors:  Cinzia Murgia; Rachele Berria; Luigi Minerba; Simonetta Sulis; Michela Murenu; Elaine Portoghese; Nicoletta Garau; Pierina Zedda; Gian Benedetto Melis
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  How high is too high in cutoff levels from 50-g glucose challenge test.

Authors:  Hyun-Hwa Cha; Ji Ye Kim; Suk-Joo Choi; Soo-Young Oh; Cheong-Rae Roh; Jong-Hwa Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2016-05-13

5.  Diagnostic ability of elevated 1-h glucose challenge test.

Authors:  L A Temming; M G Tuuli; M J Stout; G A Macones; A G Cahill
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.521

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.