Literature DB >> 15172763

The contribution of spatial remapping impairments to unilateral visual neglect.

Laure Pisella1, Jason B Mattingley.   

Abstract

Left visual neglect following right hemisphere damage is a heterogeneous phenomenon, in which several underlying impairments have been identified. Despite recent advances in understanding the neural and cognitive bases of these impairments, current theories of neglect, particularly those that emphasise attentional deficits, do not explain a number of phenomena, including: 'Ipsilesional' neglect after left orienting. Positive or 'productive' manifestations. Spatial transposition errors. Mislocalisations. Revisiting behaviour during visual search. Lack of awareness for objects toward the contralesional side of space. We propose that these manifestations of neglect can be accounted for by an additional underlying disorder of spatial remapping due to parietal dysfunction. In primary visual areas, retinotopic maps are renewed and thus overwritten at each new ocular fixation. Remapping processes operating in higher-level oculocentric visual maps of the parietal cortex ensure visual integration of these successive retinal images over time and space, by creating a constantly updated representation of stimulus locations in terms of distance and direction from the fovea. They consist in the storage, refreshment and re-localization of the different components of the visual scene that are successively attended during its exploration, and provide spatial constancy of visual perception and a spatial buffer for working memory [Cereb Cortex 5 (1995) 470; Visual Cogn 7 (2000) 17]. We begin this article by reviewing theoretical and experimental arguments that have highlighted the importance of parietal remapping processes in maintaining an accurate representation of space across saccadic shifts. We then focus on findings from the double-step saccade task, [Ann Neurol 38 (1995) 739] as a basis for our model of the role of remapping impairments in many of the symptoms of neglect. From these results, remapping impairments would be demonstrated when a saccade has to be guided across the midline after having fixated an object in either the left or right visual field for patients with either left- or right-side parietal lesions. In addition, patients with right-side lesions will have remapping impairments within the left visual field following a saccade to a left-side target (see Fig. 5). In a large part of the article, we seek to build our hypothesis based on this basic model and more speculative assumptions supported with extensive evidence from the literature. Copyright 2004 Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15172763     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  25 in total

1.  Higher level visual cortex represents retinotopic, not spatiotopic, object location.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Contextual remapping in visual search after predictable target-location changes.

Authors:  Markus Conci; Luning Sun; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-08-20

3.  Transsaccadic integration of visual features in a line intersection task.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Matthias Niemeier; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Antipointing: perception-based visual information renders an offline mode of control.

Authors:  Anika Maraj; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Saccadic-like visuomotor adaptation involves little if any perceptual effects.

Authors:  Damien Laurent; Olivier Sillan; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Disrupting saccadic updating: visual interference prior to the first saccade elicits spatial errors in the secondary saccade in a double-step task.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; David Melcher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Parietal Involvement in Constructional Apraxia as Measured Using the Pentagon Copying Task.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Jeroen de Bresser; Rutger Heinen; Huiberdina L Koek; Yael D Reijmer; Geert Jan Biessels; Esther van den Berg
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.959

Review 8.  Understanding the parietal lobe syndrome from a neurophysiological and evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Roberto Caminiti; Matthew V Chafee; Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer; Bruno B Averbeck; David A Crowe; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Parietal stimulation destabilizes spatial updating across saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Adam P Morris; Christopher D Chambers; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Some surprising findings on the involvement of the parietal lobe in human memory.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Marian Berryhill
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.