Literature DB >> 15172709

The potential use of prehospital thrombolysis in a rural community.

Donna Tedstone Doherty1, John Dowling, Peter Wright, Andrew W Murphy, Gerard Bury, Liam Bannan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is recommended that eligible patients receive thrombolytic treatment within 90 min of alerting medical or ambulance services. The Donegal Area Rapid Treatment Study (DARTS) showed that pre-hospital thrombolysis reduces "call to needle" times for patients living remote from the hospital base [Donegal Area Rapid Treatment Study (DARTS): Final Report. North Western Health Board]. AIM: To review DARTS data to describe the potential impact of pre-hospital thrombolysis on a defined population.
METHOD: Data from the DARTS project was reviewed to describe cases where thrombolysis was not administered, cases where thrombolysis was administered in hospital but not in the community, and to extrapolate these findings to other rural regions in the area to identify the potential for additional pre-hospital thrombolysis.
RESULTS: Eighty-four patients from DARTS practices presented to the district hospital with AMI during the study period with 35% (29/84) receiving thrombolysis. Of the 29 who received thrombolysis, 87% (25) were referred from the general practitioner. Of these, 32% (8/25) were administered thrombolysis by the general practitioner. Of the general practitioner referrals that did not receive pre-hospital thrombolysis (n = 17), 65% (11/17) were not thrombolysed in the community for appropriate clinical reasons and 35% (6/17) could have been potentially eligible for pre-hospital thrombolysis. Inclusion of these patients suggests a potential pre-hospital thrombolysis rate in the region of 56%. For the rural Donegal areas this would result in a potential 17 cases per year being eligible for pre-hospital thrombolysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, 35% of the 240 AMIs that occur annually in the region receive thrombolysis. Broad implementation of DARTS in the region would provide pre-hospital thrombolysis to approximately an additional 25 patients each year, with a potential for further gains. For this to become a reality, support and encouragement must be provided to all rural general practitioners, the ambulance services, receiving hospitals and policy makers to implement a pre-hospital thrombolysis policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15172709     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  2 in total

1.  The experiences and attitudes of general practitioners and hospital staff towards prehospital thrombolysis in a rural community.

Authors:  D Tedstone Doherty; J Dowling; P Wright; J Cuddihy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michael McCaul; Andrit Lourens; Tamara Kredo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.