Literature DB >> 15172275

Changing donor and recipient demographics in a heart transplantation program: influence on early outcome.

Neville A G Solomon1, James R McGiven, Peter M Alison, Peter N Ruygrok, David A Haydock, H Arthur Coverdale, Teena M West.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether broadening acceptance criteria for donor hearts and changing recipient demographics resulted in an increased perioperative morbidity and mortality in a heart transplant program.
METHODS: Donor and recipient data of 137 consecutive heart transplants performed from 1987 to 2001 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three equal eras, each of 5 years: 1987 to 1991, 1992 to 1996, and 1997 to 2001. Multivariate analyses of recipient and donor demographics and operative factors were performed to identify the predictors of low cardiac output, intraaortic balloon pump utilization, 30-day mortality, and duration of intensive care and hospital stay.
RESULTS: Significant increases in number of female recipients (p = 0.025), cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.001), recipient cross-clamp (p < 0.001), donor age (p = 0.009), donor ischemic times (p < 0.001), use of cardioplegia (p < 0.001) and the bicaval technique (p < 0.001), brain death to retrieval time (p = 0.006), and need for postoperative dialysis were observed for the three study periods, whereas length of intensive care and hospital stay decreased. Female donor (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 5.7) was identified as a risk factor for low cardiac output. Female donor (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.3 to 10.7), donor cardiac arrest (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 1.6 to 25.9), and cardiopulmonary bypass time more than 2 hours (OR, 7.6; 95% CI, 2.1 to 28.1) were associated with increased intraaortic balloon pump utilization. Intensive care stay was prolonged by the biatrial technique (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 11.9) and reduced by the use of cardioplegia (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.9), longer cardiopulmonary bypass (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.6) and aortic cross-clamp times (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Although a number of significant changes were observed during the study period, no donor, recipient, or operative factors influenced 30-day mortality. This study justifies our current donor and recipient selection policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15172275     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

1.  Open-chest management after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Hiroo Takayama; Richard J Leone; Gabriel S Aldea; Daniel P Fishbein; Edward D Verrier; Christopher T Salerno
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

2.  Influence of donor and recipient sex mismatch on heart transplant outcomes: analysis of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry.

Authors:  Kiran K Khush; Jessica T Kubo; Manisha Desai
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Great variability in donor heart acceptance practices across the United States.

Authors:  Kiran K Khush; Robyn L Ball
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Sex matters, but to what clinical avail?

Authors:  Jennifer C Matthews; Keith D Aaronson
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 8.790

5.  The impact of gender mismatching on early and late outcomes following heart transplantation.

Authors:  Yael Peled; Jacob Lavee; Michael Arad; Yedida Shemesh; Moshe Katz; Yigal Kassif; Elad Asher; Dan Elian; Yedael Har-Zahav; Ilan Goldenberg; Dov Freimark
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2016-08-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.