Literature DB >> 15171968

Nurse-led follow-up on demand or by a physician after breast cancer surgery: a randomised study.

I-L Koinberg1, B Fridlund, G-B Engholm, L Holmberg.   

Abstract

The value of routine follow-up with frequent visits to a breast cancer specialist-both in terms of detection of recurrence and patient satisfaction-has been questioned. The aim of this study was to compare nurse-led follow-up on demand versus physician follow-up after breast cancer treatment with regards to patients' well-being, satisfaction, access to medical care and medical safety. Two hundred and sixty-four consecutively selected women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, classified as UICC stage I or stage II, were randomised to follow-up at two hospitals in Sweden, either by routine medical follow-up, the physician group (PG, n=131), or on demand by a specialist nurse, the nurse group (NG, n=133). Measures were done at baseline and twice a year over a period of 5 years by means of a questionnaire containing the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), and the Satisfaction and Accessibility (SaaC) scale. Number of contacts with the health care services, number of diagnostic procedures, and time to recurrence or death were monitored. The ratings of HAD and SaaC did not show any statistically significant differences between the groups. The levels of anxiety and depression were generally low and levels of patient satisfaction high. There were no differences between the groups concerning time to recurrence or death. This study indicates that women with breast cancer in stages I to II can be followed up by a specialist nurse with high patient satisfaction and good medical safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15171968     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2003.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 1462-3889            Impact factor:   2.398


  25 in total

1.  Breast cancer survivors' perceptions of survivorship care options.

Authors:  Erica L Mayer; Adrienne B Gropper; Bridget A Neville; Ann H Partridge; Danielle B Cameron; Eric P Winer; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  D Howell; T F Hack; T K Oliver; T Chulak; S Mayo; M Aubin; M Chasen; C C Earle; A J Friedman; E Green; G W Jones; J M Jones; M Parkinson; N Payeur; C M Sabiston; S Sinclair
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 3.  Patients' and healthcare professionals' views of cancer follow-up: systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth A Lewis; Richard D Neal; Maggie Hendry; Barbara France; Nefyn H Williams; Daphne Russell; Dyfrig A Hughes; Ian Russell; Nicholas S A Stuart; David Weller; Clare Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Follow-up of cancer in primary care versus secondary care: systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth A Lewis; Richard D Neal; Nefyn H Williams; Barbara France; Maggie Hendry; Daphne Russell; Dyfrig A Hughes; Ian Russell; Nicholas S A Stuart; David Weller; Clare Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Follow-up of epithelial ovarian cancer: overdue for a major rethink.

Authors:  Paul Hoskins
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Risk-based health care, the cancer survivor, the oncologist, and the primary care physician.

Authors:  Mary S McCabe; Ann H Partridge; Eva Grunfeld; Melissa M Hudson
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Survivorship services for adult cancer populations: a pan-Canadian guideline.

Authors:  D Howell; T F Hack; T K Oliver; T Chulak; S Mayo; M Aubin; M Chasen; C C Earle; A J Friedman; E Green; G W Jones; J M Jones; M Parkinson; N Payeur; C M Sabiston; S Sinclair
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 8.  Towards a personalised approach to aftercare: a review of cancer follow-up in the UK.

Authors:  Nicola J Davies; Lynn Batehup
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.442

9.  Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Merel L Kimman; Monique Mf Bloebaum; Carmen D Dirksen; Ruud Ma Houben; Philippe Lambin; Liesbeth J Boersma
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Telephone follow-up of oncology patients: the contribution of the nurse specialist for a Service-Dominant Logic in hospital.

Authors:  Corinne Rochette; Anne Sophie Michallet; Stéphanie Malartre-Sapienza; Sophie Rodier
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.