Literature DB >> 15171575

Effect on gait and socket comfort in unilateral trans-tibial amputees after exchange to a polyurethane concept.

I Aström1, A Stenström.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Trans-tibial amputees with different indications for amputation often have stump problems. Many active amputees have limits in daily life and sports activities because of pressure ulcers, friction, allergic dermatitis or volume changes. Many methods and materials have been tried to make a well-fitted socket. A new polyurethane concept had been designed with a shock absorbing effect. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare a conventional suspension with a polyurethane concept with regard to the amputees' satisfaction, socket comfort, physical capacity and to analyse the long-term effect. The total material includes 29 unilateral trans-tibial amputees. They answered a questionnaire after 2 months use of the polyurethane concept and were interviewed after 3 and 5 years. After 3 years 22 amputees and after 5 years 20 amputees used the polyurethane concept. Gait was registered in 7 amputees. Speed and symmetry index (SI) for temporal, stride and kinematics variables were used to evaluate gait. The amputees reported that the polyurethane concept was better or much better in physical capacity in 117 (67%) and socket comfort was better or much better in 119 (82%) compared with the conventional suspension. There was no obvious symmetry difference in gait variables in speed, step length, step time or single support or in kinematics knee variables. The amputees tended to walk faster, decrease in symmetry in temporal and stride variables and increase in symmetry in kinematics variables with the polyurethane concept. After 5 years 6 had died and 20 amputees of the surviving 23 used the polyurethane concept.
CONCLUSIONS: The polyurethane concept increased comfort considerably and physical activity increased when the trans-tibial amputees changed from conventional suspension. Gait registration was not useful to evaluate the amputees' satisfaction or socket comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15171575     DOI: 10.3109/03093640409167922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

Review 1.  Toward higher-performance bionic limbs for wider clinical use.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Ivan Vujaklija; Rickard Brånemark; Anthony M J Bull; Hans Dietl; Bernhard Graimann; Levi J Hargrove; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; He Helen Huang; Thorvaldur Ingvarsson; Hilmar Bragi Janusson; Kristleifur Kristjánsson; Todd Kuiken; Silvestro Micera; Thomas Stieglitz; Agnes Sturma; Dustin Tyler; Richard F Ff Weir; Oskar C Aszmann
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  Comparative study between Dermo, Pelite, and Seal-In X5 liners: effect on patient's satisfaction and perceived problems.

Authors:  Sadeeq Ali; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Nooranida Arifin; Hossein Gholizadeh; Nasrul Anwar Abd Razak; Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-08-11

3.  The effects of suction and pin/lock suspension systems on transtibial amputees' gait performance.

Authors:  Hossein Gholizadeh; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Arezoo Eshraghi; Sadeeq Ali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Prosthesis satisfaction in lower limb amputees: A systematic review of associated factors and questionnaires.

Authors:  Erwin C Baars; Ernst Schrier; Pieter U Dijkstra; Jan H B Geertzen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Effects of the unity vacuum suspension system on transtibial gait for simulated non-level surfaces.

Authors:  Gabrielle Thibault; Hossein Gholizadeh; Emily Sinitski; Natalie Baddour; Edward D Lemaire
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.