Literature DB >> 15170637

Clinically-based determination of safe DNAemia cutoff levels for preemptive therapy or human cytomegalovirus infections in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Daniele Lilleri1, Fausto Baldanti, Marta Gatti, Francesca Rovida, Luca Dossena, Simona De Grazia, Maria Torsellini, Giuseppe Gerna.   

Abstract

Transplantation Centers using human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) antigenemia-based preemptive therapy will need to replace in the near future the antigenemia assay with a more standardized and automatable assay, such as a molecular assay quantifying HCMV DNA in blood (DNAemia). Thus, in view of replacing antigenemia with clinically safe cutoff values, DNAemia levels corresponding to antigenemia cutoffs guiding HCMV preemptive therapy were determined retrospectively in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCTR) using an "in-house" quantitative PCR (QPCR) method. Since preemptive therapy had prevented appearance of HCMV disease in all patients tested, DNA cutoffs determined retrospectively had to be considered as safe clinically as antigenemia cutoffs used prospectively. However, in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), initiating preemptive therapy upon an antigenemia cutoff of 100 pp65-positive leukocytes, a DNAemia cutoff of 300,000 copies/ml blood had positive and negative predictive values of >90%, indicating that a DNAemia cutoff could achieve, in terms of prevention of HCMV disease, the same clinical results as the antigenemia cutoff. In HSCTR, initiating preemptive therapy upon first antigenemia positivity, a DNAemia cutoff of 10,000 copies/ml blood had a positive predictive value of >90%, indicating that the great majority of patients treated under the antigenemia guidance would have been treated also using this DNA cutoff. On the other hand, the negative predictive value of 28.6% indicated that two out of three HSCTR had been treated under the antigenemia guidance having the same levels of viral DNA as the untreated patients. The data suggest that a quantitative cutoff could be adopted as a guiding criterion for preemptive therapy also in HSCTR. Regression analysis allowed to determine the DNAemia (corresponding to QPCR) cutoff values for two commercial assays tested both in solid organ and HSCTR. Retrospective DNAemia cutoff values will be verified for safety in prospective trials. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15170637     DOI: 10.1002/jmv.20107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   2.327


  7 in total

1.  Efficacy of a viral load-based, risk-adapted, preemptive treatment strategy for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Margaret L Green; Wendy Leisenring; Daniel Stachel; Steven A Pergam; Brenda M Sandmaier; Anna Wald; Lawrence Corey; Michael Boeckh
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Quantification of DNA in plasma by an automated real-time PCR assay (cytomegalovirus PCR kit) for surveillance of active cytomegalovirus infection and guidance of preemptive therapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Concepción Gimeno; Carlos Solano; José C Latorre; Juan C Hernández-Boluda; María A Clari; María J Remigia; Santiago Furió; Marisa Calabuig; Nuria Tormo; David Navarro
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Correlation and clinical utility of pp65 antigenemia and quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays for detection of cytomegalovirus in pediatric renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Brian Rha; David Redden; Mark Benfield; Fred Lakeman; Richard J Whitley; Masako Shimamura
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2012-06-13

4.  Recombinant luciferase-expressing human cytomegalovirus (CMV) for evaluation of CMV inhibitors.

Authors:  Ran He; Gordon Sandford; Gary S Hayward; William H Burns; Gary H Posner; Michael Forman; Ravit Arav-Boger
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.099

5.  Comparison of quantitation of cytomegalovirus DNA by real-time PCR in whole blood with the cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay.

Authors:  Seonhee Kwon; Bo Kyeung Jung; Sun-Young Ko; Chang Kyu Lee; Yunjung Cho
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Comparison of quantitative cytomegalovirus real-time PCR in whole blood and pp65 antigenemia assay: clinical utility of CMV real-time PCR in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Su-Mi Choi; Dong-Gun Lee; Jihyang Lim; Sun Hee Park; Jung-Hyun Choi; Jin-Hong Yoo; Jong-Wook Lee; Yonggoo Kim; Kyungja Han; Woo-Sung Min; Wan-Shik Shin; Chun-Choo Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are both required for prevention of HCMV disease in seropositive solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Elisa Gabanti; Francesca Bruno; Daniele Lilleri; Chiara Fornara; Paola Zelini; Ilaria Cane; Clara Migotto; Eleonora Sarchi; Milena Furione; Giuseppe Gerna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.