PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of paclitaxel to doxorubicin plus cisplatin improves overall survival (OS) in women with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Secondary comparisons included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and toxicities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible, consenting patients received doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (AP), or doxorubicin 45 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (day 1), followed by paclitaxel 160 mg/m(2) (day 2) with filgrastim support (TAP). The initial doxorubicin dose in the AP arm was reduced to 45 mg/m(2) in patients with prior pelvic radiotherapy and those older than 65 years. Both regimens were repeated every 3 weeks to a maximum of seven cycles. Patients completed a neurotoxicity questionnaire before each cycle. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-three women (10 ineligible) were registered. Objective response (57% v 34%; P <.01), PFS (median, 8.3 v 5.3 months; P <.01), and OS (median, 15.3 v 12.3 months; P =.037) were improved with TAP. Treatment was hematologically well tolerated, with only 2% of patients receiving AP, and 3% of patients receiving TAP experiencing neutropenic fever. Neurologic toxicity was worse for those receiving TAP, with 12% grade 3, and 27% grade 2 peripheral neuropathy, compared with 1% and 4%, respectively, in those receiving AP. Patient-reported neurotoxicity was significantly higher in the TAP arm following two cycles of therapy. CONCLUSION: TAP significantly improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with AP. Evaluation of this regimen in the high-risk adjuvant setting is warranted, but close attention should be paid to the increased risk of peripheral neuropathy.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of paclitaxel to doxorubicin plus cisplatin improves overall survival (OS) in women with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Secondary comparisons included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and toxicities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible, consenting patients received doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (AP), or doxorubicin 45 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (day 1), followed by paclitaxel 160 mg/m(2) (day 2) with filgrastim support (TAP). The initial doxorubicin dose in the AP arm was reduced to 45 mg/m(2) in patients with prior pelvic radiotherapy and those older than 65 years. Both regimens were repeated every 3 weeks to a maximum of seven cycles. Patients completed a neurotoxicity questionnaire before each cycle. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-three women (10 ineligible) were registered. Objective response (57% v 34%; P <.01), PFS (median, 8.3 v 5.3 months; P <.01), and OS (median, 15.3 v 12.3 months; P =.037) were improved with TAP. Treatment was hematologically well tolerated, with only 2% of patients receiving AP, and 3% of patients receiving TAP experiencing neutropenic fever. Neurologic toxicity was worse for those receiving TAP, with 12% grade 3, and 27% grade 2 peripheral neuropathy, compared with 1% and 4%, respectively, in those receiving AP. Patient-reported neurotoxicity was significantly higher in the TAP arm following two cycles of therapy. CONCLUSION: TAP significantly improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with AP. Evaluation of this regimen in the high-risk adjuvant setting is warranted, but close attention should be paid to the increased risk of peripheral neuropathy.
Authors: Ana Oaknin; Víctor Rodríguez-Freixinós; Isabela Díaz de Corcuera; Fernando Rivera; José María del Campo Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Kimberly K Leslie; Kristina W Thiel; Michael J Goodheart; Koen De Geest; Yichen Jia; Shujie Yang Journal: Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.844
Authors: Larissa A Meyer; Brian M Slomovitz; Bojana Djordjevic; Shannon N Westin; David A Iglesias; Mark F Munsell; Yunyun Jiang; Rosemarie Schmandt; Russell R Broaddus; Robert L Coleman; John M Galbincea; Karen H Lu Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Kathleen N Moore; Michael W Sill; Meaghan E Tenney; Christopher J Darus; David Griffin; Theresa L Werner; Peter G Rose; Robert Behrens Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-07-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Nick M Spirtos; Danielle Enserro; Howard D Homesley; Susan K Gibbons; David Cella; Robert T Morris; Koen DeGeest; Roger B Lee; David S Miller Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Dana M Roque; Stefania Bellone; Diana P English; Natalia Buza; Emiliano Cocco; Sara Gasparrini; Ileana Bortolomai; Elena Ratner; Dan-Arin Silasi; Masoud Azodi; Thomas J Rutherford; Peter E Schwartz; Alessandro D Santin Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Marguerite L Palisoul; Jeanne M Quinn; Emily Schepers; Ian S Hagemann; Lei Guo; Kelsey Reger; Andrea R Hagemann; Carolyn K McCourt; Premal H Thaker; Matthew A Powell; David G Mutch; Katherine C Fuh Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 6.261