PURPOSE: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9342 was initiated to determine the optimal dose of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks to women with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred seventy-four women with metastatic breast cancer who had received one or no prior chemotherapy regimens were randomly assigned to one of three paclitaxel dosing regimens-175 mg/m(2), 210 mg/m(2), or 250 mg/m(2)-each administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Women completed self-administered quality of life and symptom assessment questionnaires at baseline and after three cycles of treatment. RESULTS: No evidence of a significant dose-response relationship was demonstrated over the dose range assessed. Response rates were 23%, 26%, and 21% for the three regimens, respectively. A marginally significant association (P =.04) was seen between dose and time to progression; however, in a multivariate analysis, the difference was even less apparent. No statistically significant difference was seen in survival. Neurotoxicity and hematologic toxicity were more severe on the higher dose arms. There was no significant difference in quality of life on the three arms. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion to women with metastatic breast cancer did not improve response rate, survival, or quality of life. There was a slight improvement in time to progression with higher dose therapy, which was offset by greater toxicity. When a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel is administered every 3 weeks, 175 mg/m(2) should be considered the optimal dose.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9342 was initiated to determine the optimal dose of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks to women with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred seventy-four women with metastatic breast cancer who had received one or no prior chemotherapy regimens were randomly assigned to one of three paclitaxel dosing regimens-175 mg/m(2), 210 mg/m(2), or 250 mg/m(2)-each administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Women completed self-administered quality of life and symptom assessment questionnaires at baseline and after three cycles of treatment. RESULTS: No evidence of a significant dose-response relationship was demonstrated over the dose range assessed. Response rates were 23%, 26%, and 21% for the three regimens, respectively. A marginally significant association (P =.04) was seen between dose and time to progression; however, in a multivariate analysis, the difference was even less apparent. No statistically significant difference was seen in survival. Neurotoxicity and hematologic toxicity were more severe on the higher dose arms. There was no significant difference in quality of life on the three arms. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion to women with metastatic breast cancer did not improve response rate, survival, or quality of life. There was a slight improvement in time to progression with higher dose therapy, which was offset by greater toxicity. When a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel is administered every 3 weeks, 175 mg/m(2) should be considered the optimal dose.
Authors: Delma Aurélia da Silva Simão; Antônio Lúcio Teixeira; Raissa Silva Souza; Elenice Dias Ribeiro de Paula Lima Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Gary R Zirpoli; Susan E McCann; Lara E Sucheston-Campbell; Dawn L Hershman; Gregory Ciupak; Warren Davis; Joseph M Unger; Halle C F Moore; James A Stewart; Claudine Isaacs; Timothy J Hobday; Muhammad Salim; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Julie R Gralow; G Thomas Budd; Kathy S Albain; Christine B Ambrosone Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Stacy L Moulder; Frankie A Holmes; Anthony W Tolcher; Peter Thall; Kristine Broglio; Vicente Valero; Aman U Buzdar; Susan G Arbuck; Andrew Seidman; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Rebecca A Miksad; Vera Zietemann; Raffaella Gothe; Ruth Schwarzer; Annette Conrads-Frank; Petra Schnell-Inderst; Björn Stollenwerk; Uwe Siebert Journal: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.188