Literature DB >> 15168895

Word category and verb--argument structure information in the dynamics of parsing.

Stefan Frisch1, Anja Hahne, Angela D Friederici.   

Abstract

One of the core issues in psycholinguistic research concerns the relationship between word category information and verb-argument structure (e.g. transitivity) information of verbs in the process of sentence parsing. In two experiments (visual versus auditory presentation) using event-related brain potentials (ERPs), we addressed this question by presenting sentences in which the critical word simultaneously realized both a word category and a transitivity violation. ERPs for sentences with both types of violation clustered with the patterns for sentences with a word category violation only, but were different from the patterns elicited by argument structure violations in isolation, since only the latter elicited an N400 ERP component. The finding that an argument structure violation evoked an N400 only if the phrase structure of the respective sentence was correct suggests that a successful integration of the word category information of a verb functionally precedes the application of its argument structure information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15168895     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  15 in total

1.  Brain responses to filled gaps.

Authors:  Arild Hestvik; Nathan Maxfield; Richard G Schwartz; Valerie Shafer
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  ERPs reveal comparable syntactic sentence processing in native and non-native readers of English.

Authors:  Sonja A Kotz; Phillip J Holcomb; Lee Osterhout
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2007-12-03

3.  The electrophysiological manifestation of Dutch Verb Second violations.

Authors:  Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Roelien Bastiaanse
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-03-29

4.  Detecting event-related recurrences by symbolic analysis: applications to human language processing.

Authors:  Peter Beim Graben; Axel Hutt
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Electrophysiological responses to argument structure violations in healthy adults and individuals with agrammatic aphasia.

Authors:  Aneta Kielar; Aya Meltzer-Asscher; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Toddlers encode similarities among novel words from meaningful sentences.

Authors:  Erica H Wojcik; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-02-19

7.  Bilinguals on the garden-path: Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Liv J Hoversten; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2021-04-08

8.  The representation of the verb's argument structure as disclosed by fMRI.

Authors:  Ramin Assadollahi; Marcus Meinzer; Tobias Flaisch; Jonas Obleser; Brigitte Rockstroh
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  Eric Pakulak; Helen J Neville
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.