Literature DB >> 15167846

Variation in medical student grading criteria: a survey of clerkships in obstetrics and gynecology.

Christopher M Zahn1, Sally W Nalesnik, Alicia Y Armstrong, Andrew J Satin, William H J Haffner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess how obstetrics/gynecology clerkships incorporate methods of student assessment into grades. STUDY
DESIGN: A survey that included a broad range of assessment methods was distributed to obstetrics/gynecology clerkship directors registered with the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Respondents were asked to indicate the methods used for assessment and to indicate the weight assigned to these methods in determining a student grade.
RESULTS: Of the 146 surveys distributed, there were 53 respondents (36.4%). The most common methods of subjective assessment included evaluation of patient presentation skills and performance on ward rounds. The 2 most commonly used objective methods, general assessment of cognitive knowledge and the National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examination in Obstetrics and Gynecology, generally accounted for 75% of the final grade, although these same 2 components also had the widest range of assigned weights reported.
CONCLUSION: Assessment methods and incorporation into a final grade vary widely across obstetrics/gynecology clerkships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15167846     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

1.  Distribution of Honors Grades Across Fourth-year Emergency Medicine Clerkships.

Authors:  Matthew M Hall; Nicole M Dubosh; Edward Ullman
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2017-03-22

2.  Narrative descriptions should replace grades and numerical ratings for clinical performance in medical education in the United States.

Authors:  Janice L Hanson; Adam A Rosenberg; J Lindsey Lane
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-21

3.  Faculty perspectives on the use of standardized versus non-standardized oral examinations to assess medical students.

Authors:  Natasha Johnson; Holly Khachadoorian-Elia; Celeste Royce; Carey York-Best; Katharyn Atkins; Xiaodong P Chen; Andrea Pelletier
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2018-09-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.