Literature DB >> 15167834

Intrauterine repair of spina bifida: preoperative predictors of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus.

Joseph P Bruner1, Noel Tulipan, George Reed, George H Davis, Kelly Bennett, Karla S Luker, Mary E Dabrowiak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine which factors that are present at the time of intrauterine repair of spina bifida could predict the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt for hydrocephalus during the first year of life. STUDY
DESIGN: One hundred seventy-eight fetuses have undergone intrauterine repair of spina bifida at Vanderbilt University Medical Center since 1997. Among these, 116 fetuses had a postnatal follow-up period of at least 12 months. The primary outcome of the study was the need for a ventriculoperitoneal shunt for hydrocephalus during the first year of life. The following variables were analyzed: maternal demographics (age, race, gravidity, and parity), gestational age at the time of surgery, ventricular size, degree of hindbrain herniation (determined by magnetic resonance imaging in 33 cases), type of defect (myelomeningocele vs myeloschisis), upper level of the lesion, presence of talipes, and intraoperative use of a lumbar drain. Statistical analysis was performed with logistic regression (to test the association of fetal and maternal factors and the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting), 2-sample t-tests for comparison of means, and receiver operating curves with the use of the probabilities that were generated by the logistic regression for both continuous and categoric versions of the factors.
RESULTS: Sixty-one of 116 of the fetuses (54%) who underwent operation in utero required the placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt before the age of 1 year. The upper level of the lesion was the strongest predictor of shunt requirement (adjusted odds ratio per 1 level increase with the use of continuous variables [S1 through T10], 1.73 [95% CI, 1.22- 2.44]; adjusted odds ratio with the use of upper lesion level >or=L3 vs <L3 as a categorized variable, 5.7 [95% CI, 2.18- 14.7]), followed by gestational age at the time of surgery (adjusted odds ratio per 1 week increase with the use of continuous variables, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.06-1.77]; adjusted odds ratio with the use of gestational age <or=25 weeks vs >25 weeks as a categorized variable, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.28-8.24]), and preoperative ventricular size (adjusted odds ratio per 1 unit increase with the use of continuous variables, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.01-1.36]; adjusted odds ratio with the use of ventricular size >or=14 mm vs <14 mm as a categorized variable, 3.5 [95% CI, 1.08-11.16]). Receiver operating curves with the use of the probabilities that were generated by the logistic regression analyses for both the continuous and categoric versions of the factors were compared. The area under the curve was approximately 0.81 for both methods. Thirty-eight of 48 of the fetuses (79%) with an upper level of the lesion >or=L3 required placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, although 25 of 68 of the fetuses (37%) with lesions <or=L4 did not (P < .0001). Eighty-four percent of the fetuses with a preoperative ventricular size >or=14 mm (27/32 fetuses) needed a shunt compared with 41% of the fetuses (34/81 fetuses) with smaller ventricles (P=.03). Seventy-one percent of the fetuses who underwent operation at >25 weeks of gestation also required shunt placement (37/52 fetuses); 39% of the fetuses (24/61 fetuses) who were treated <or=25 weeks of gestation did not (P=.01). Thirty-five fetuses had a lesion level <or=L4 and a ventricular size <14 mm and underwent operation at <or=25 weeks of gestation. Among these, 8 fetuses (23%) required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt during the first year of life.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that, among fetuses who underwent operation in utero for spina bifida, fetuses with a ventricular size of <14 mm at the time of surgery, fetuses who had surgery at <or=25 weeks of gestation, and fetuses with defects that were located at <or=L4 were less likely to require ventriculoperitoneal shunting for hydrocephalus during the first year of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15167834     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.10.702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

Review 1.  Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele.

Authors:  Payam Saadai; Diana L Farmer
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.430

2.  Minimally invasive fetoscopic interventions: an overview in 2010.

Authors:  Thomas Kohl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Current status of fetal surgery.

Authors:  Prema Menon; K L N Rao
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Percutaneous fetoscopic patch closure of human spina bifida aperta: advances in fetal surgical techniques may obviate the need for early postnatal neurosurgical intervention.

Authors:  Thomas Kohl; Kristina Tchatcheva; Waltraut Merz; Hans C Wartenberg; Axel Heep; Andreas Müller; Axel Franz; Rüdiger Stressig; Winfried Willinek; Ulrich Gembruch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Reliability of MR Imaging-Based Posterior Fossa and Brain Stem Measurements in Open Spinal Dysraphism in the Era of Fetal Surgery.

Authors:  M Aertsen; J Verduyckt; F De Keyzer; T Vercauteren; F Van Calenbergh; L De Catte; S Dymarkowski; P Demaerel; J Deprest
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Myelomeningocele: the management of the associated hydrocephalus.

Authors:  G Tamburrini; P Frassanito; K Iakovaki; F Pignotti; C Rendeli; D Murolo; C Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  New directions in fetal surgery for myelomeningocele.

Authors:  Sandra K Kabagambe; Y Julia Chen; Melissa A Vanover; Payam Saadai; Diana L Farmer
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Congenital myelomeningocele - do we have to change our management?

Authors:  Steffi Mayer; Margit Weisser; Holger Till; Gerd Gräfe; Christian Geyer
Journal:  Cerebrospinal Fluid Res       Date:  2010-10-14

9.  Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele and the need for cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement.

Authors:  Noel Tulipan; John C Wellons; Elizabeth A Thom; Nalin Gupta; Leslie N Sutton; Pamela K Burrows; Diana Farmer; William Walsh; Mark P Johnson; Larry Rand; Susan Tolivaisa; Mary E D'alton; N Scott Adzick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 10.  Emerging magnetic resonance imaging techniques in open spina bifida in utero.

Authors:  Andras Jakab; Kelly Payette; Luca Mazzone; Sonja Schauer; Cécile Olivia Muller; Raimund Kottke; Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble; Ruth Tuura; Ueli Moehrlen; Martin Meuli
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.