Literature DB >> 15167584

Rapamycin protects allografts from rejection while simultaneously attacking tumors in immunosuppressed mice.

Gudrun E Koehl1, Joachim Andrassy, Markus Guba, Sebastian Richter, Alexander Kroemer, Marcus N Scherer, Markus Steinbauer, Christian Graeb, Hans J Schlitt, Karl-Walter Jauch, Edward K Geissler.   

Abstract

Cancer is an increasingly recognized problem associated with immunosuppression. Recent reports, however, suggest that the immunosuppressive agent rapamycin has anti-cancer properties that could address this problem. Thus far, rapamycin's effects on immunity and cancer have been studied separately. Here we tested the effects of rapamycin, versus cyclosporine A (CsA), on established tumors in mice simultaneously bearing a heart allograft. In one tumor-transplant model, BALB/c mice received subcutaneous syngenic CT26 colon adenocarcinoma cells 7 days before C3H ear-heart transplantation. Rapamycin or CsA treatment was initiated with transplantation. In a second model system, a B16 melanoma was established in C57BL/6 mice that received a primary vascularized C3H heart allograft. In vitro angiogenic effects of rapamycin and CsA were tested in an aortic ring assay. Results show that CT26 tumors grew for 2 weeks before tumor complications occurred. However, rapamycin protected allografts, inhibited tumor growth, and permitted animal survival. In contrast, CsA-treated mice succumbed to advancing tumors, albeit with a functioning allograft. Rapamycin's antitumor effect also functioned in severe combined immunodeficient BALB/c mice. Similar effects of the drugs occurred with B16 melanomas and primary vascularized C3H allografts in C57BL/6 mice. Furthermore, in this model, rapamycin inhibited the tumor growth-enhancing effects of CsA. Moreover, in vitro experiments showed that CsA promotes angiogenesis by a transforming growth factor-beta-related mechanism, and that this effect is abrogated by rapamycin. This study demonstrates that rapamycin simultaneously protects allografts from rejection and attacks tumors in a complex transplant-tumor situation. Notably, CsA protects allografts from rejection, but cancer progression is promoted in transplant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15167584     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200405150-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  49 in total

Review 1.  Immunologic mechanisms in RCC and allogeneic renal transplant rejection.

Authors:  Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Solid, non-skin, post-liver transplant tumors: Key role of lifestyle and immunosuppression management.

Authors:  Christophe Carenco; Stéphanie Faure; José Ursic-Bedoya; Astrid Herrero; Georges Philippe Pageaux
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Immunosuppression: towards a logical approach in liver transplantation.

Authors:  I Perry; J Neuberger
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Overview of immunosuppression in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Anjana A Pillai; Josh Levitsky
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Combined inhibition of p38 and Akt signaling pathways abrogates cyclosporine A-mediated pathogenesis of aggressive skin SCCs.

Authors:  Aadithya Arumugam; Stephanie B Walsh; Jianmin Xu; Farrukh Afaq; Craig A Elmets; Mohammad Athar
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Calcineurin inhibitors activate the proto-oncogene Ras and promote protumorigenic signals in renal cancer cells.

Authors:  Dipak Datta; Alan G Contreras; Aninda Basu; Olivier Dormond; Evelyn Flynn; David M Briscoe; Soumitro Pal
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Rapamycin protects mice from staphylococcal enterotoxin B-induced toxic shock and blocks cytokine release in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Teresa Krakauer; Marilyn Buckley; Haleem J Issaq; Stephen D Fox
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  [Progress in immunosuppression].

Authors:  C P Strassburg; M J Bahr; T Becker; J Klempnauer; M P Manns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 9.  Renal transplantation in the elderly.

Authors:  Ramesh Saxena; Xueqing Yu; Mauricio Giraldo; Juan Arenas; Miguel Vazquez; Christopher Y Lu; Nosratola D Vaziri; Fred G Silva; Xin J Zhou
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  A prospective randomised, open-labeled, trial comparing sirolimus-containing versus mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppression in patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Andreas A Schnitzbauer; Carl Zuelke; Christian Graeb; Justine Rochon; Itxarone Bilbao; Patrizia Burra; Koert P de Jong; Christophe Duvoux; Norman M Kneteman; Rene Adam; Wolf O Bechstein; Thomas Becker; Susanne Beckebaum; Olivier Chazouillères; Umberto Cillo; Michele Colledan; Fred Fändrich; Jean Gugenheim; Johann P Hauss; Michael Heise; Ernest Hidalgo; Neville Jamieson; Alfred Königsrainer; Philipp E Lamby; Jan P Lerut; Heikki Mäkisalo; Raimund Margreiter; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Ingrid Mutzbauer; Gerd Otto; Georges-Philippe Pageaux; Antonio D Pinna; Jacques Pirenne; Magnus Rizell; Giorgio Rossi; Lionel Rostaing; Andre Roy; Victor Sanchez Turrion; Jan Schmidt; Roberto I Troisi; Bart van Hoek; Umberto Valente; Philippe Wolf; Heiner Wolters; Darius F Mirza; Tim Scholz; Rudolf Steininger; Gunnar Soderdahl; Simone I Strasser; Karl-Walter Jauch; Peter Neuhaus; Hans J Schlitt; Edward K Geissler
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.