Literature DB >> 15167472

Evaluation of apical debris removal using various sizes and tapers of ProFile GT files.

Lynn J Albrecht1, J Craig Baumgartner, J Gordon Marshall.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of preparation taper using size #20 or size #40 ProFile GT files on the ability to introduce irrigant and remove debris from root canals. Forty-eight bilaterally matched pairs of extracted teeth were instrumented using.04-,.06-,.08-, and.10-tapered files with one tooth of each pair enlarged to size #20 and the other to size #40. The teeth were sectioned at 1 mm and 3 mm from the apex, and the amount of remaining debris was calculated as a percentage of the total lumen area. The following variables were evaluated: apical preparation size, preparation taper, total volume of irrigation, depth of irrigation needle penetration, and number of instrument changes needed to reach working length. Compared with the size #40 preparations, a significantly greater percentage of remaining debris was observed in the size #20 preparations at the 1-mm level for all tapers except the.10 taper group in which there was no significant difference (p = 0.982). There were no significant differences between any groups at 3 mm. Results suggest that debris is more effectively removed using.04,.06, and.08 ProFile GT instruments when the apical preparation size is larger (size #40) compared with size #20 apical preparations. When a taper of.10 can be produced at the apical extent of the canal, there is no difference in debris removal between the two preparations sizes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15167472     DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200406000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  26 in total

1.  Canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two irrigant agitation techniques in a closed system.

Authors:  L Susin; Y Liu; J C Yoon; J M Parente; R J Loushine; D Ricucci; T Bryan; R N Weller; D H Pashley; F R Tay
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 5.264

2.  Apical debris extrusion associated with oval shaped canals: a comparative study of WaveOne vs Self-Adjusting File.

Authors:  Eleftherios Terry R Farmakis; G G Sotiropoulos; I Abràmovitz; M Solomonov
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Smear layer and debris removal using manual Ni-Ti files compared with rotary Protaper Ni- Ti files - An In-Vitro SEM study.

Authors:  J M V Raghavendra Reddy; Prasanna Latha; Basavana Gowda; Varadendra Manvikar; D Benal Vijayalaxmi; Kalyana Chakravarthi Ponangi
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-02-26

4.  Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery.

Authors:  Franklin R Tay; Li-Sha Gu; G John Schoeffel; Courtney Wimmer; Lisiane Susin; Kai Zhang; Senthil N Arun; Jongryul Kim; Stephen W Looney; David H Pashley
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal.

Authors:  Mary Kinue Nakamune Uezu; Maria Leticia Borges Britto; Cleber K Nabeshima; Raul Capp Pallotta
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Postoperative pain after endodontic treatment of necrotic teeth submitted to large apical preparation using oscillatory kinematics.

Authors:  Ricardo Machado; Daniel Comparin; Sérgio-Aparecido Ignácio; Ulisses-Xavier-da Silva Neto
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-02-01

7.  Reduction of Enterococcus faecalis in curved root canals after various sizes and tapers of canal preparation.

Authors:  Amir Abbas Moshari; Nahid Mohammadzadeh Akhlaghi; Nahid Rahimifard; Soheila Darmiani
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

8.  Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Vandana J Gade; Shweta K Sedani; Jyoti S Lokade; Leena D Belsare; Jaykumar R Gade
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2013-10

9.  The Effect of Size and Taper of Apical Preparation in Reducing Intra-Canal Bacteria: A Quantitative SEM Study.

Authors:  Nahid Mohammadzadeh Akhlaghi; Nahid Rahimifard; Amirabbas Moshari; Mehdi Vatanpour; Soheila Darmiani
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-12-24

10.  The Effect of Preparation Size on Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal; A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.

Authors:  Mehdi Tabrizizadeh; Ameneh Shareghi
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2015-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.