Literature DB >> 15167252

Anthropometric measurements of the facial framework in adulthood: age-related changes in eight age categories in 600 healthy white North Americans of European ancestry from 16 to 90 years of age.

Leslie G Farkas1, Otto G Eiben, Stefan Sivkov, Bryan Tompson, Marko J Katic, Christopher R Forrest.   

Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional anthropometric study was to determine the age-related changes in the facial framework during adulthood in healthy white North Americans of European ancestry (261 male subjects and 339 female subjects). Five measurements, four horizontal and one vertical, defining the framework were taken from the skin and bony surface of the face in the maturation period (16-20 years) and in 10-year age categories of adulthood (21-90 years). As well, the thickness of the soft-tissue cover between these two anatomical levels was measured. The categories between 21 and 40 years represented early adulthood, those between 41 and 70 years represented middle adulthood, and those between 71 and 90 years represented late adulthood. The forehead width in both sexes increased significantly on the skin and bony surface from the maturation period to early adulthood. In middle adulthood, the changes were significant only sporadically. In late adulthood, the upper and lower jaw showed a harmonious change with age, mostly increasing on both the skin and bony surface. The face width proved to be the most stable measurement and had the thinnest soft-tissue cover. No consistent pattern emerged during adulthood in increases or decreases within the facial framework; however, an unexpected harmony was noted between the values of the measurements in early and late adulthood in both sexes on both the skin and bony surface. The thickness of the soft-tissue cover at the bony landmarks was greatest in the midface, with a moderately decreasing tendency in both sexes. In the lower jaw, the soft tissue showed significant increases in thickness in early adulthood and moderate to large decreases in late adulthood. Anthropometric analysis of the facial framework in adulthood marks only the first step in establishing the morphological changes of the aging face. Quantitative evaluation of changes within the facial framework of the aging population must be carried out in more detail. Increased worldwide migration results in a mixing of people of various racial/ethnic origins and necessitates a general anthropometric analysis of the aging face to provide more reliable guidelines for therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15167252     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200403000-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  12 in total

1.  Combined soft and skeletal tissue modelling of normal and dysmorphic midface postnatal development.

Authors:  Amel Ibrahim; Michael Suttie; Neil W Bulstrode; Jonathan A Britto; David Dunaway; Peter Hammond; Patrizia Ferretti
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Surface cephalometric and anthropometric variables in OSA patients: statistical models for the OSA phenotype.

Authors:  Rita A Perri; Kristina Kairaitis; Peter Cistulli; John R Wheatley; Terence C Amis
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  The person in the mirror: using the enfacement illusion to investigate the experiential structure of self-identification.

Authors:  Ana Tajadura-Jiménez; Matthew R Longo; Rosie Coleman; Manos Tsakiris
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2012-11-05

4.  The 3D Facial Norms Database: Part 1. A Web-Based Craniofacial Anthropometric and Image Repository for the Clinical and Research Community.

Authors:  Seth M Weinberg; Zachary D Raffensperger; Matthew J Kesterke; Carrie L Heike; Michael L Cunningham; Jacqueline T Hecht; Chung How Kau; Jeffrey C Murray; George L Wehby; Lina M Moreno; Mary L Marazita
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2015-10-22

5.  Sexually dimorphic facial features vary according to level of autistic-like traits in the general population.

Authors:  Syed Zulqarnain Gilani; Diana Weiting Tan; Suzanna N Russell-Smith; Murray T Maybery; Ajmal Mian; Peter R Eastwood; Faisal Shafait; Mithran Goonewardene; Andrew Jo Whitehouse
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Facial Anthropometric Norms among Kosovo - Albanian Adults.

Authors:  Gloria Staka; Flurije Asllani-Hoxha; Venera Bimbashi
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2017-09

7.  Computed Tomographic Analysis of the Sagittal Orbit-globe Relationship.

Authors:  Zachary R Abramson; Srinivas M Susarla; Anand R Kumar; Asim F Choudhri
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec

8.  Aspects of facial contrast decrease with age and are cues for age perception.

Authors:  Aurélie Porcheron; Emmanuelle Mauger; Richard Russell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Using the 3D Facial Norms Database to investigate craniofacial sexual dimorphism in healthy children, adolescents, and adults.

Authors:  Matthew J Kesterke; Zachary D Raffensperger; Carrie L Heike; Michael L Cunningham; Jacqueline T Hecht; Chung How Kau; Nichole L Nidey; Lina M Moreno; George L Wehby; Mary L Marazita; Seth M Weinberg
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.027

Review 10.  Facial Genetics: A Brief Overview.

Authors:  Stephen Richmond; Laurence J Howe; Sarah Lewis; Evie Stergiakouli; Alexei Zhurov
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.