Literature DB >> 15167155

Incremental net benefit in the analysis of economic data from clinical trials, with application to the CADET-Hp trial.

Andrew R Willan1.   

Abstract

In clinical trials it has become increasingly common for cost data to be collected in addition to data on clinical effectiveness. In response to this, new statistical methodology has been developed. Initially, efforts were focused on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, but as the problems with ratio statistics became apparent, attention was switched to incremental net benefit. In this paper statistical methods based on an incremental net benefit approach are given and illustrated with an example from the gastrointestinal literature. The relationship between incremental net benefit and incremental cost-effectiveness is emphasized.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15167155     DOI: 10.1097/00042737-200406000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  12 in total

Review 1.  Sample size determination for cost-effectiveness trials.

Authors:  Andrew R Willan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Value of information and pricing new healthcare interventions.

Authors:  Andrew R Willan; Simon Eckermann
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Adjunctive Lifestyle Interventions for the Management of Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrew Gallagher; Violetta Shersher; Duncan Mortimer; Helen Truby; Terry Haines
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cost-effectiveness of Rotavirus Vaccine in Low-Income and Lower-Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Sabbir Haider; Usa Chaikledkaew; Montarat Thavorncharoensap; Sitaporn Youngkong; Md Ashadul Islam; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.835

5.  Cost-utility analysis of telemonitoring versus conventional hospital-based follow-up of patients with pacemakers. The NORDLAND randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Antonio Lopez-Villegas; Daniel Catalan-Matamoros; Salvador Peiro; Knut Tore Lappegard; Remedios Lopez-Liria
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluation of the cost-utility of phosphate binders as a treatment option for hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the economic evaluations.

Authors:  Kamolpat Chaiyakittisopon; Oraluck Pattanaprateep; Narisa Ruenroengbun; Tunlanut Sapankaew; Atiporn Ingsathit; Gareth J Mckay; John Attia; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-03-06

7.  Meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues.

Authors:  Bhavani Shankara Bagepally; Usa Chaikledkaew; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; John Attia; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Economic evaluation of seasonal influenza vaccination in elderly and health workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Piyameth Dilokthornsakul; Le My Lan; Ammarin Thakkinstian; Raymond Hutubessy; Philipp Lambach; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-04-21

9.  Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes who fail metformin monotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies.

Authors:  Bhavani Shankara Bagepally; Usa Chaikledkaew; Yogesh Krishnarao Gurav; Thunyarat Anothaisintawee; Sitaporn Youngkong; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Mark McEvoy; John Attia; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-07

10.  A new approach for sample size calculation in cost-effectiveness studies based on value of information.

Authors:  Clément Bader; Sébastien Cossin; Aline Maillard; Antoine Bénard
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.