Literature DB >> 15166907

Preparticipation examination (screening): practical issues as determined by sport: a United Kingdom perspective.

Mark E Batt1, Rod Jaques, Mike Stone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pre-participation examination, screening and health surveillance are part of the job specification for many roles within Sports Medicine. The type and scope of this activity varies enormously, with little consensus as to best evidence-based practice. The purpose of this work was to explore and understand the practical approaches to pre-participation examination, screening and health surveillance in two contrasting sport scenarios. DATA SOURCE: Team physicians for British Triathlon and Manchester United Football Club. DATA SYNTHESIS/
METHODS: Information was gathered under the headings: why screen, screening objectives, practical issues and constraints?
RESULTS: The systems evolved within these two sports reflect their respective opportunities and constraints. Different systems, each with merit, have evolved with some generalizable concepts across sport.
CONCLUSIONS: A perfect system for pre-participation examination, screening and health surveillance across all sport does not exist, however, within specific sport scenarios examples of good practice are demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15166907     DOI: 10.1097/00042752-200405000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Sport Med        ISSN: 1050-642X            Impact factor:   3.638


  8 in total

1.  Pre-participation assessment in young athletes: a state affair.

Authors:  Giorgio Galanti; Laura Stefani; Lorenzo Liverani; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Preparticipation medical evaluation in professional sport in the UK: theory or practice?

Authors:  C W Fuller; E O Ojelade; A Taylor
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Observations on the "Lausanne Recommendations" on sudden cardiovascular death in sport.

Authors:  Bruce Hamilton; Rod Jaques; Richard Budgett
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  The International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statement on periodic health evaluation of elite athletes: March 2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  EXPLORATION OF SCORE AGREEMENT ON A MODIFIED UPPER QUARTER Y-BALANCE TEST KIT AS COMPARED TO THE UPPER QUARTER Y-BALANCE TEST.

Authors:  Josh Cramer; Miguel Quintero; Alex Rhinehart; Caitlin Rutherford; Alan Nasypany; James May; Russell T Baker
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-02

6.  Functional movement screen normative values in a young, active population.

Authors:  Anthony G Schneiders; Asa Davidsson; Elvira Hörman; S John Sullivan
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-06

7.  Physiotherapist delivered preparticipation examination: rationale and evidence.

Authors:  Lorrie Maffey; Carolyn Emery
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-11

8.  Validity, Reliability and Reproducibility of OctoBalance Test as Tool to Measure the Upper Limb Compared to Modified-Upper Quarter Y-Balance Test.

Authors:  Álvaro Velarde-Sotres; Antonio Bores-Cerezal; Marcos Mecías-Calvo; Stefanía Carvajal-Altamiranda; Julio Calleja-González
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.