Literature DB >> 15166901

Screening of athletes for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

Karen Holzer1, Peter Brukner.   

Abstract

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) has a high prevalence in elite athletes, particularly endurance athletes, winter athletes and swimmers. Recent studies have shown that a clinical diagnosis of EIB has only a moderate sensitivity and specificity for EIB. This finding in conjunction with a recent ruling by the IOC-medical commission that all athletes competing in initially the 2003 Winter Olympic Games in Salt Lake City, and now the 2004 Summer Olympic Games in Athens require objective evidence of EIB, support the need for bronchial provocation challenge tests in the diagnosis of EIB. The recommended bronchial provocation challenge test is the eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) challenge; this challenge test has been shown to have both a high sensitivity and specificity for EIB. Pharmacological challenge tests, such as the methacholine challenge test, have been shown to have only a low sensitivity but high specificity for EIB in elite athletes, and are thus not recommended in the athlete with pure EIB. Exercise challenge tests performed both in the laboratory and field have a high specificity for EIB; however those in the laboratory have only a moderate sensitivity for EIB in elite athletes, whilst those in the field are limited by problems with standardization. The osmotic challenge tests, such as the hypertonic saline and newer inhaled dry powder mannitol challenge have both a high sensitivity and specificity for EIB, and may be used as an alternative to the EVH challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15166901     DOI: 10.1097/00042752-200405000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Sport Med        ISSN: 1050-642X            Impact factor:   3.638


  18 in total

Review 1.  Making the diagnosis of asthma in the athlete.

Authors:  Chris Randolph
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.667

2.  Screening elite winter athletes for exercise induced asthma: a comparison of three challenge methods.

Authors:  J W Dickinson; G P Whyte; A K McConnell; M G Harries
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  The International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statement on periodic health evaluation of elite athletes: March 2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Diagnostic exercise challenge testing.

Authors:  Christopher Randolph
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.806

5.  Role of bronchoprovocation tests in identifying exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in a non-athletic population: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jessica H Y Tan; Wui Mei Chew; Therese S Lapperre; Gan Liang Tan; Chian Min Loo; Mariko S Koh
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Asthma and athletes: therapy to compete.

Authors:  John M Weiler; Christine Malloy
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 7.  Exercise-induced bronchospasm in children.

Authors:  Chris Randolph
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.667

8.  High Incidence of Bronchospastic Response to a Stair Climbing Exercise.

Authors:  Tomas Venckunas; Domantas Balsys
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-04

9.  Prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in teenage football players in Tunisia.

Authors:  Imen Aissa; Amine Frikha; Habib Ghedira
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

10.  Approach to the diagnosis and management of suspected exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by primary care physicians.

Authors:  James H Hull; Peter J Hull; Jonathan P Parsons; John W Dickinson; Les Ansley
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.