Literature DB >> 15166618

Intraindividual variability in busulfan pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing a bone marrow transplant: assessment of a test dose and first dose strategy.

Celeste Lindley1, Thomas Shea, Jeannine McCune, Stacy Shord, Jodi Decker, Donald Harvey, William P Petros, Don Garbriel, Jonathan Serody, Suzanne Kirby, Joseph Wiley.   

Abstract

Busulfan systemic exposure correlates with regimen-related toxicity, engraftment and relapse in select patients receiving high-dose oral busulfan (HD-BU) (1 mg/kg dose or 40 mg/m dose every 6 h for 16 doses) as part of a preparative regimen for bone marrow transplantation. Therapeutic drug monitoring is frequently conducted after the first HD-BU dose in order to determine necessary dose adjustments. Limitations with this method include the need for rapid determination of busulfan plasma concentration and difficulties with estimating apparent oral clearance in patients who exhibit delayed absorption of HD-BU. This pharmacokinetic study was conducted to evaluate the ability of the apparent oral clearance obtained after administering a lower (0.25 mg/kg) test dose and the traditional (1 mg/kg) first dose to predict the dose required to achieve a desired area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) at steady-state (13th dose). In addition, the pharmacokinetic parameters of test, first and 13th dose were compared to assess intrasubject variability. Twenty-nine patients received a test dose of oral busulfan (0.25 mg/kg) the day immediately prior to initiation of HD-BU. Busulfan serum concentrations were measured following the test, first and 13th doses using gas chromatography with electron capture detection. The AUC and apparent oral clearance were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Therapeutic drug monitoring following the first dose of HD-BU was conducted for clinical purposes in six patients, and dose adjustment between the first and 13th dose occurred in only two patients. The dose-corrected test dose and first dose AUC and apparent oral clearance were not bioequivalent (two one-sided t-tests, +/-20%). The first dose and 13th dose AUC and apparent oral clearance were also not bioequivalent. Six of the 29 patients receiving HD-BU dose based on weight (1 mg/kg) would have achieved a steady-state AUC of 3600-5400 ng x h/ml, a frequently used target AUC, as compared to eight and 13 patients if their dose was based on the apparent oral clearance following the test dose and first dose HD-BU, respectively. Monitoring busulfan concentrations after a test dose or a first dose provides a better estimate of the dose needed to achieve the target steady-state AUC as compared to traditional weight-based dosing. However, significant intraindividual variability exists in the apparent oral clearance of busulfan and follow-up therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended particularly if the desired target AUC range is narrow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15166618     DOI: 10.1097/01.cad.0000127145.50172.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of algorithms for oral busulphan area under the concentration-time curve limited sampling estimate.

Authors:  Fredrik Sjöö; Ibrahim El-Serafi; Jon Enestig; Jonas Mattsson; Johan Liwing; Moustapha Hassan
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Busulfan dosing algorithm and sampling strategy in stem cell transplantation patients.

Authors:  Francine A de Castro; Chiara Piana; Belinda P Simões; Vera L Lanchote; O Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Phase I study of dose-escalated busulfan with fludarabine and alemtuzumab as conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant: reduced clearance at high doses and occurrence of late sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease.

Authors:  Peter H O'Donnell; Andrew S Artz; Samir D Undevia; Rish K Pai; Paula Del Cerro; Sarah Horowitz; Lucy A Godley; John Hart; Federico Innocenti; Richard A Larson; Olatoyosi M Odenike; Wendy Stock; Koen Van Besien
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2010-10-04

4.  Quantification of busulfan in saliva and plasma in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children : validation of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method.

Authors:  Manfred Rauh; Daniel Stachel; Michaela Kuhlen; Michael Gröschl; Wolfgang Holter; Wolfgang Rascher
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Treosulfan, Fludarabine, and Low-Dose Total Body Irradiation for Children and Young Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Prospective Phase II Trial of the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium.

Authors:  Eneida R Nemecek; Ralf A Hilger; Alexia Adams; Bronwen E Shaw; Deidre Kiefer; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; John E Levine; Gregory Yanik; Wing Leung; Julie-An Talano; Paul Haut; David Delgado; Neena Kapoor; Aleksandra Petrovic; Roberta Adams; Rabi Hanna; Hemalatha Rangarajan; Jignesh Dalal; Joseph Chewning; Michael R Verneris; Stacy Epstein; Lauri Burroughs; Evelio D Perez-Albuerne; Michael A Pulsipher; Colleen Delaney
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Intravenous busulfan for autologous stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a survey of 952 patients on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  Arnon Nagler; Myriam Labopin; Norbert-Claude Gorin; Felicetto Ferrara; Miguel A Sanz; Depei Wu; Antonio Torres Gomez; Simona Lapusan; Giuseppe Irrera; Jose E Guimaraes; Aida Botelho Sousa; Angelo M Carella; Norbert Vey; William Arcese; Avichai Shimoni; Raanan Berger; Vanderson Rocha; Mohamad Mohty
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  Variability in the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulphan given as a single daily dose to paediatric blood or marrow transplant recipients.

Authors:  Christa E Nath; John W Earl; Nalini Pati; Katherine Stephen; Peter J Shaw
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Exposure equivalence between IV (0.8 mg/kg) and oral (1 mg/kg) busulfan in adult patients.

Authors:  F Léger; L Nguyen; C Puozzo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Population pharmacokinetics of busulfan in pediatric and young adult patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant: a model-based dosing algorithm for personalized therapy and implementation into routine clinical use.

Authors:  Janel R Long-Boyle; Rada Savic; Shirley Yan; Imke Bartelink; Lisa Musick; Deborah French; Jason Law; Biljana Horn; Morton J Cowan; Christopher C Dvorak
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.681

10.  Phase I/II Trial of Dose-Escalated Busulfan Delivered by Prolonged Continuous Infusion in Allogeneic Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Thomas C Shea; Christine Walko; Yunro Chung; Anastasia Ivanova; Julia Sheets; Kamakshi Rao; Don Gabriel; Terry Comeau; William Wood; James Coghill; Paul Armistead; Stefanie Sarantopoulos; Jonathan Serody
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.