Literature DB >> 15166107

Toward resolving the challenges of sepsis diagnosis.

Shawn D Carrigan1, George Scott, Maryam Tabrizian.   

Abstract

Sepsis in the United States has an estimated annual healthcare cost of 16.7 billion dollars and leads to 120,000 deaths. Insufficient development in both medical diagnosis and treatment of sepsis has led to continued growth in reported cases of sepsis over the past two decades with little improvement in mortality statistics. Efforts over the last decade to improve diagnosis have unsuccessfully sought to identify a "magic bullet" proteic biomarker that provides high sensitivity and specificity for infectious inflammation. More recently, genetic methods have made tracking regulation of the genes responsible for these biomarkers possible, giving current research new direction in the search to understand how host immune response combats infection. Despite the breadth of research, inadequate treatment as a result of delayed diagnosis continues to affect approximately one fourth of septic patients. In this report we review past and present diagnostic methods for sepsis and their respective limitations, and discuss the requirements for more timely diagnosis as the next step in curtailing sepsis-related mortality. We also present a proposal toward revision of the current diagnostic paradigm to include real-time immune monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15166107     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.032144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  41 in total

Review 1.  Translational potential of systems-based models of inflammation.

Authors:  P T Foteinou; S E Calvano; S F Lowry; I P Androulakis
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Procalcitonin: diagnostic value in systemic infections in chronic kidney disease or renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Raluca Dumea; Dimitrie Siriopol; Simona Hogas; Irina Mititiuc; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Clinical sepsis and septic shock--definition, diagnosis and management principles.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Model-based insulin sensitivity as a sepsis diagnostic in critical care.

Authors:  Amy Blakemore; Sheng-Hui Wang; Aaron Le Compte; Geoffrey M Shaw; Xing-Wei Wong; Jessica Lin; Thomas Lotz; Christopher E Hann; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

5.  A novel microbead-based microfluidic device for rapid bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Authors:  J He; X Mu; Z Guo; H Hao; C Zhang; Z Zhao; Q Wang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Photonic Crystal Surfaces as a General Purpose Platform for Label-Free and Fluorescent Assays.

Authors:  Brian T Cunningham
Journal:  JALA Charlottesv Va       Date:  2010-04-01

7.  Clinical evaluation of multiple inflammation biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis for patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Authors:  M Reichsoellner; R B Raggam; J Wagner; R Krause; M Hoenigl
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Early diagnosis of disease using microbead array technology: A review.

Authors:  Sanam Foroutan Parsa; Atieh Vafajoo; Azin Rostami; Reza Salarian; Mohammad Rabiee; Navid Rabiee; Ghazal Rabiee; Mohammadreza Tahriri; Amir Yadegari; Daryoosh Vashaee; Lobat Tayebi; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 6.558

9.  Microalbuminuria: A novel biomarker of sepsis.

Authors:  Surupa Basu; Mahuya Bhattacharya; Tapan K Chatterjee; Subimal Chaudhuri; Subhash K Todi; Arghya Majumdar
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-01

Review 10.  Sepsis biomarkers: a review.

Authors:  Charalampos Pierrakos; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.