Literature DB >> 15165309

Efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery for paranasal sinus mucocele including modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure for frontal sinus mucocele.

Jwu Jin Khong1, Raman Malhotra, Dinesh Selva, Peter John Wormald.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of the modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure (MELP) for complicated frontal mucoceles and endoscopic marsupialization for other paranasal sinus mucoceles. It was a retrospective, consecutive case review of sinus mucoceles treated endoscopically by a single surgeon over a four-year period (1998-2002). There were 41 mucoceles in 28 patients, including 24 frontal, eight frontoethmoidal, three ethmoidal, five maxillary and one frontal mucocele. Twenty-one patients underwent the modified Lothrop procedure for frontal mucoceles, and seven underwent simple drainage and marsupialization for frontoethmoidal, ethmoidal and maxillary mucoceles. At median follow-up of 16 months, all patients had a patent mucocele opening. Patients treated by drainage and marsupialization did not have any complications or mucocele recurrence. All patients treated by the modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure had improvement in symptoms and signs. Four patients had minor complications including epistaxis and adhesions and five required further surgery. The average hospital in-patient stay was 2 +/- 1.4 days. Endoscopic techniques, including MELP are effective in the short term for the management of complex and simple paranasal sinus mucoceles. MELP has a useful place in the management of mucoceles with a significant bony partition from an adjacent sinus or nasal cavity. It is also indicated when the mucocele is associated with loss of lateral support in the sinus with risk of medial-wall collapse of the orbital contents obstructing drainage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15165309     DOI: 10.1258/002221504323086534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  8 in total

1.  Selecting the best approach to the frontal sinus.

Authors:  Carl M Philpott; David C McKiernan; Amin R Javer
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-20

Review 2.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

3.  Transorbital neuroendoscopic management of sinogenic complications involving the frontal sinus, orbit, and anterior cranial fossa.

Authors:  Jae H Lim; Maya G Sardesai; Manuel Ferreira; Kris S Moe
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-11-15

4.  Frontal Mucocele causing Unilateral Proptosis.

Authors:  E James; A Dutta; H Swami; R Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

5.  Maxillary sinus mucocele: predisposing factors, clinical presentations, and treatment.

Authors:  Mosaad Abdel-Aziz; Hassan El-Hoshy; Khaled Azooz; Nader Naguib; Ahmed Hussein
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-11-28

Review 6.  Outcomes After Frontal Sinus Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review.

Authors:  Adam S DeConde; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Endoscopic sinus surgery for maxillary sinus mucoceles.

Authors:  Fatma Caylakli; Haluk Yavuz; Alper Can Cagici; Levent Naci Ozluoglu
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Airflow in the Human Nasal Passage and Sinuses of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Subjects.

Authors:  Haribalan Kumar; Ravi Jain; Richard G Douglas; Merryn H Tawhai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.