Literature DB >> 15165093

Phase I study of gemcitabine given weekly as a short infusion for non-small cell lung cancer: results and possible immune system-related mechanisms.

M L Levitt1, B Kassem, W E Gooding, L M Miketic, R J Landreneau, P F Ferson, R Keenan, S A Yousem, C A Lindberg, M R Trenn, R S Ponas, P Tarasoff, J M Sabatine, D Friberg, T L Whiteside.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the nature of the toxicities associated with gemcitabine given as a short infusion to patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Secondary objectives were to monitor immunologic response, clinical response, and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients diagnosed with advanced inoperable NSCLC and performance status of 0 or 1 participated in this study. Patients consisted of 22 males and 10 females whose median age was 62 years (range 32-79). Gemcitabine was administered as a 30 min infusion once weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest. Patients were enrolled at six gemcitabine dose levels ranging from 1000 to 3500 mg/m2. Patients completed a median of four cycles (range 1-17). Responses were evaluated after every two cycles.
RESULTS: Toxicity was evaluated in all 32 patients. The MTD was not reached as gemcitabine was well tolerated at all dose levels. Grade 4 toxicity occurred in three (9%) patients: pulmonary and lymphocytopenia in one patient each, and both neurocortical and cardiac in one patient. Grade 3 toxicity was found in a total of 20 (63%) patients: pulmonary in 10 (31%) patients; pain in 6 (19%) patients; liver toxicity in 6 (19%) patients; leukopenia and lymphocytopenia in 5 (16%) patients each; anemia, nausea, and cardiac toxicity in 3 (9%) patients each; proteinuria and infection in 2 (6%) patients each; and hemorrhage in 1 (3%) patient. Of the 29 patients evaluable for response, seven objective responses were achieved: six at the 2200 mg/m2 dose level and one at the 2800 mg/m2 dose level. The distribution of responses differed significantly by dose (P = 0.0124 by the exact chi-square test for independence). The overall response rate was 24.1% (95% CI, 10.3-43.5%). At 6 h post-infusion, there was a significant increase in spontaneous tumor necrosis factor (TNF) release and stimulated interleukin (IL)-2 production, and significant decreases in total white blood cell and lymphocyte counts (CD3+, CD8+, and CD16+ lymphocytes) and resting and stimulated superoxide production by formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP), phorbol myristate acetate, and opsonized zymosan (OPS-Z). At 24 h post-infusion, there were significant decreases in total lymphocyte count, lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4-, CD8+, CD56+, CD19+), and in resting and stimulated superoxide production by fMLP and OPS-Z. There also appeared to be an association between the levels of spontaneous TNF release and the severity of both gastrointestinal (GI) and pulmonary toxicities.
CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine given as a short infusion was well tolerated at the dose levels of 1000-3500 mg/m2. The MTD was not reached. Toxicities appeared to be cumulative with multiple cycles. Gemcitabine appears to have activity against NSCLC. Although there was a differential dose-response rate among dose levels, increasing the gemcitabine dose beyond 2200mg/m2 did not show increased clinical response. Gemcitabine appears to modulate the immune response, which may in turn mediate both response and toxicity, although no statistically significant correlation between immune and clinical response was detected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15165093     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2003.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  8 in total

Review 1.  Vaccines based on whole recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells.

Authors:  Andressa Ardiani; Jack P Higgins; James W Hodge
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 2.  T-regulatory cells: key players in tumor immune escape and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Andrea Facciabene; Gregory T Motz; George Coukos
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  The anticancer immune response: indispensable for therapeutic success?

Authors:  Laurence Zitvogel; Lionel Apetoh; François Ghiringhelli; Fabrice André; Antoine Tesniere; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Cigarette smoking and gemcitabine-induced neutropenia in advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Meaghan O'Malley; Patrick Healy; Stephanie Daignault; Nithya Ramnath
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.935

Review 5.  Anticancer therapy and lung injury: molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Li Li; Henry Mok; Pavan Jhaveri; Mark D Bonnen; Andrew G Sikora; N Tony Eissa; Ritsuko U Komaki; Yohannes T Ghebre
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.512

6.  Immunological monitoring for prediction of clinical response to antitumor vaccine therapy.

Authors:  Irina N Mikhaylova; Irina Zh Shubina; George Z Chkadua; Natalia N Petenko; Lidia F Morozova; Olga S Burova; Robert Sh Beabelashvili; Kermen A Parsunkova; Natalia V Balatskaya; Dmitrii K Chebanov; Vadim I Pospelov; Valeria V Nazarova; Anastasia S Vihrova; Evgeny A Cheremushkin; Alvina A Molodyk; Mikhail V Kiselevsky; Lev V Demidov
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-11

Review 7.  T-regulatory cell modulation: the future of cancer immunotherapy?

Authors:  S Nizar; J Copier; B Meyer; M Bodman-Smith; C Galustian; D Kumar; A Dalgleish
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Multiple limb compartment syndrome as a manifestation of capillary leak syndrome secondary to metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor overdose: A case report.

Authors:  Daisuke Kasugai; Kosuke Tajima; Naruhiro Jingushi; Norimichi Uenishi; Akihiko Hirakawa
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.