| Literature DB >> 15164849 |
Lars-Ake Appelqvist1, Paul Addis, Ingemar Björkhem, Jacques Olivier Bosset, Maria Fiorenza Caboni, Paresh Dutta, Andre Grandgirard, Fransesc Guardiola, Lung-Bin Hau, Jacob Holm Nielsen, Antony Hugget, Lucy Sun Hwang, Jorma Kumpulainen, Sinead McCluskey, Toshiaki Ohshima, Roman Przbylski, Alex Sevanian, Pearlly Yan.
Abstract
A compilation of literature data on the content of cholesterol oxidation products (COP) in various food products and in blood demonstrates a large variation in content in products or tissues of very similar nature when analyzed in different laboratories according to a large number of methods. The lack of validated, internationally recognized methodology with published accuracy and precision has so far hindered such assessments. Hence an interlaboratory comparision of methodologies of COP analysis was undertaken on egg yolk powders (EYP), whole milk powders (WMP), skim milk powders (SMP), and lard (L). Each product type had one fresh sample (low) and one aged (high) in COP contents. A total of 17 sets of results on WMP, 15 on SMP and EYP, and 13 on L were compared. Overall results (mg/kg sample) varied extensively: Fresh EYP 0.72-265, aged EYP 2.51-361; fresh WMP 0.02-18.1, aged WMP 0.02-26.9; fresh SMP 0.02-6.51, aged SMP <0.01-6.51; fresh L 0.18-97, aged L 4.15-452. Some results were questioned, viz., those from laboratories not indicating substantial differences between samples "low" and "high" in total COP. Others were excluded because of lack of verification of identity of gas chromatographic peaks by mass spectrometry. Then a more narrow range of core results (mg/kg sample) was observed: Fresh EYP 5.69-29.5 sample, aged EYP 11.8-79.0; fresh WMP 0.12-1.76, aged WMP 1.17-13.7; fresh SMP <0.30-<1.21, aged SMP 0.30-2.26; fresh L 0.18-5.07, aged L 94.4-231. At a workshop discussing the results, numerous recommendations were made toward more reliable methodology for determination of COP in foods.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15164849
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J AOAC Int ISSN: 1060-3271 Impact factor: 1.913