Literature DB >> 15163686

Effects of the lurcher mutation on GluR1 desensitization and activation kinetics.

Rebecca Meier Klein1, James R Howe.   

Abstract

Previous studies of the lurcher mutation in GluR1 channels concluded that its main effect is to create constitutively active channels (Kohda et al., 2000; Taverna et al., 2000). GluR1Lc channels also exhibit slowed kinetics and a shift in their apparent affinity for glutamate (Kohda et al., 2000; Taverna et al., 2000). Here, we have undertaken a kinetic analysis of GluR1Lc channels to quantify the effects of lurcher and to determine the relative contribution of these effects to the lurcher phenotype. Analysis of GluR1Lc leak current demonstrated that the 2,3-dioxo-6-nitro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro[f]quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide (NBQX)-sensitive portion of the leak current corresponded to a current generated by glutamate concentrations similar to the levels of contaminating glutamate measured in our normal external solutions. This result, and the small size of the leak current relative to the currents evoked by saturating glutamate, indicates that GluR1Lc channels exhibit little or no constitutive activity. Our results indicate that the primary effect of the lurcher mutation is to increase the affinity of GluR1 for glutamate and reduce the desensitization of GluR1 at nanomolar concentrations. We also found that the mutation makes both the rate and extent of GluR1Lc channel desensitization depend strongly on subunit occupancy. We conclude that the poor survival of GluR1Lc-transfected cells, and presumably cerebellar neurons in lurcher mice, results because channels carrying the lurcher mutation open and do not desensitize at ambient levels of glutamate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15163686      PMCID: PMC6729373          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0660-04.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  32 in total

1.  Key amino acid residues within the third membrane domains of NR1 and NR2 subunits contribute to the regulation of the surface delivery of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors.

Authors:  Martina Kaniakova; Barbora Krausova; Vojtech Vyklicky; Miloslav Korinek; Katarina Lichnerova; Ladislav Vyklicky; Martin Horak
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function.

Authors:  Stephen F Traynelis; Lonnie P Wollmuth; Chris J McBain; Frank S Menniti; Katie M Vance; Kevin K Ogden; Kasper B Hansen; Hongjie Yuan; Scott J Myers; Ray Dingledine
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 3.  Challenges for and current status of research into positive modulators of AMPA receptors.

Authors:  Simon E Ward; Benjamin D Bax; Mark Harries
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  The relationship between agonist potency and AMPA receptor kinetics.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Antoine Robert; Stine B Vogensen; James R Howe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  A domain linking the AMPA receptor agonist binding site to the ion pore controls gating and causes lurcher properties when mutated.

Authors:  Sabine M Schmid; Christoph Körber; Solveig Herrmann; Markus Werner; Michael Hollmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  SOL-1 is an auxiliary subunit that modulates the gating of GLR-1 glutamate receptors in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Penelope J Brockie; Jerry E Mellem; David M Madsen; Craig S Walker; Michael M Francis; Andres V Maricq
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Reconstitution of invertebrate glutamate receptor function depends on stargazin-like proteins.

Authors:  Craig S Walker; Penelope J Brockie; David M Madsen; Michael M Francis; Yi Zheng; Sri Koduri; Jerry E Mellem; Nathalie Strutz-Seebohm; Andres V Maricq
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Glutamate receptor pores.

Authors:  James E Huettner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Modulation of the dimer interface at ionotropic glutamate-like receptor delta2 by D-serine and extracellular calcium.

Authors:  Kasper B Hansen; Peter Naur; Natalie L Kurtkaya; Anders S Kristensen; Michael Gajhede; Jette S Kastrup; Stephen F Traynelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Ionotropic glutamate-like receptor delta2 binds D-serine and glycine.

Authors:  Peter Naur; Kasper B Hansen; Anders S Kristensen; Shashank M Dravid; Darryl S Pickering; Lars Olsen; Bente Vestergaard; Jan Egebjerg; Michael Gajhede; Stephen F Traynelis; Jette S Kastrup
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.