Literature DB >> 15163500

Seroprotection rate, mean fold increase, seroconversion rate: which parameter adequately expresses seroresponse to influenza vaccination?

W E P Beyer1, A M Palache, G Lüchters, J Nauta, A D M E Osterhaus.   

Abstract

Serological parameters intend to describe antibody response to influenza vaccine in a population. However, there is uncertainty about the mathematical appropriateness and the biological or clinical meaning of conventionally used parameters. Theoretical considerations and exploration of a data-set of 16 studies with an inactivated (subunit) influenza vaccine involving 1176 adult subjects suggest the following conclusions. In a population seronegative before vaccination, the post-vaccination geometric mean titre (post-GMT) is a meaningful immunological parameter adequately expressing antibody response after vaccination. The related protection rate (PR) is a good surrogate parameter for protection provided by a given vaccine, thus relevant to public health. However, in a population partially seropositive before vaccination (due to previous exposition to influenza antigens), the same parameters may, under certain conditions, seriously overestimate the antibody response, as they do not account for the pre-vaccination state. Conventional attempts to address pre-vaccination antibody are associated with either loss of information (exclusion of seropositive subjects) or incomplete control of pre-vaccination state (mean fold increase (MFI), response rate (RR)). Although not devoid of theoretical limitations (heteroscedasticity), correction of post-GMT and PR by linear regression appears to provide better estimates of antibody response and vaccine immunogenicity.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15163500     DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virus Res        ISSN: 0168-1702            Impact factor:   3.303


  66 in total

1.  Evidence-based mechanistic reasoning.

Authors:  Jeremy Howick; Paul Glasziou; Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  A new approach to estimate vaccine efficacy based on immunogenicity data applied to influenza vaccines administered by the intradermal or intramuscular routes.

Authors:  Laurent Coudeville; Philippe Andre; Fabrice Bailleux; Françoise Weber; Stanley Plotkin
Journal:  Hum Vaccin       Date:  2010-10-01

Review 3.  Impact of host genetic polymorphisms on vaccine induced antibody response.

Authors:  Janina E Linnik; Adrian Egli
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Vulnerability, distress, and immune response to vaccination in older adults.

Authors:  Suzanne C Segerstrom; Jaime K Hardy; Daniel R Evans; Richard N Greenberg
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 7.217

5.  Neutralizing and hemagglutination-inhibiting activities of antibodies elicited by the 2004-2005 influenza vaccine against drifted viruses.

Authors:  Filippo Ansaldi; Sabrina Bacilieri; Federica Banfi; Paolo Durando; Laura Sticchi; Giancarlo Icardi; Roberto Gasparini
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2006-01

Review 6.  Nanotools for megaproblems: probing protein misfolding diseases using nanomedicine modus operandi.

Authors:  Vladimir N Uversky; Alexander V Kabanov; Yuri L Lyubchenko
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Response to influenza vaccine in people with non-protective HI antibody titers.

Authors:  Vincenzo Baldo; Tatjana Baldovin; Annarosa Floreani; Michele Minuzzo; Renzo Trivello
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Influenza vaccine response in adults exposed to perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctanesulfonate.

Authors:  Claire Looker; Michael I Luster; Antonia M Calafat; Victor J Johnson; Gary R Burleson; Florence G Burleson; Tony Fletcher
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Open-label trial of immunogenicity and safety of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in adults ≥ 50 years of age in Mexico.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Tinoco; Christine Juergens; Guillermo M Ruiz Palacios; Jorge Vazquez-Narvaez; Hermann Leo Enkerlin-Pauwells; Vani Sundaraiyer; Sudam Pathirana; Elena Kalinina; William C Gruber; Daniel A Scott; Beate Schmoele-Thoma
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2014-12-10

10.  Evaluation of vaccine-induced antibody responses: impact of new technologies.

Authors:  Daniel J Zaccaro; Diane K Wagener; Carol C Whisnant; Herman F Staats
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.