Literature DB >> 15163134

The relationships between delivery agents' physical activity level and the likelihood of implementing a physical activity program.

Paul Estabrooks1, Michael Bradshaw, Elizabeth Fox, Joseph Berg, David A Dzewaltowski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the relationships between delivery agents'physical activity characteristics and subsequent adoption of a physical activity promotion program for community implementation.
METHODS: Agents responsible for county health promotion in Kansas (n = 91; 94.5% women; mean age = 43.0 +/- 11) completed interviews that assessed physical activity self-efficacy, value, and participation. Subsequent implementation of a physical activity program was monitored. The response rate was 100%.
RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of the agents met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for physical activity, 35% were active but did not meet CDC recommendations, and 10% were inactive. On the basis of logistic regression analysis (Wald statistic = 7.63; p < .05), agents who met recommendations were more likely to adopt the program for their county (69%) than were agents who were less active (41%) and inactive (11%). DISCUSSION: The data suggest that increasing the proportion of delivery agents who meet the CDC recommendations for physical activity could be related with a higher proportion of communities implementing physical activity programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15163134     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-18.5.350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  6 in total

1.  The effect of disseminating evidence-based interventions that promote physical activity to health departments.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Paula Ballew; Kathrin L Brown; Michael B Elliott; Debra Haire-Joshu; Gregory W Heath; Matthew W Kreuter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Individual and setting level predictors of the implementation of a skin cancer prevention program: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Borsika A Rabin; Eric Nehl; Tom Elliott; Anjali D Deshpande; Ross C Brownson; Karen Glanz
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 3.  Understanding for whom, under what conditions, and how group-based physical activity interventions are successful: a realist review.

Authors:  Samantha M Harden; Desmond McEwan; Benjamin D Sylvester; Megan Kaulius; Geralyn Ruissen; Shauna M Burke; Paul A Estabrooks; Mark R Beauchamp
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Fidelity to and comparative results across behavioral interventions evaluated through the RE-AIM framework: a systematic review.

Authors:  Samantha M Harden; Bridget Gaglio; Jo Ann Shoup; Kimberlee A Kinney; Sallie Beth Johnson; Fabiana Brito; Kacie C A Blackman; Jamie M Zoellner; Jennie L Hill; Fabio A Almeida; Russell E Glasgow; Paul A Estabrooks
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-08

5.  General practice referral of 'at risk' populations to community leisure services: applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the impact of a community-based physical activity programme for inactive adults with long-term conditions.

Authors:  E L Bird; M S Y Biddle; J E Powell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Health Educator Participation in Virtual Micro-Credentialing Increases Physical Activity in Public Health Competencies.

Authors:  Anna Dysart; Laura E Balis; Bryce T Daniels; Samantha M Harden
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.