Literature DB >> 15162853

Environmental impact of coal industry and thermal power plants in India.

U C Mishra1.   

Abstract

Coal is the only natural resource and fossil fuel available in abundance in India. Consequently, it is used widely as a thermal energy source and also as fuel for thermal power plants producing electricity. India has about 90,000 MW installed capacity for electricity generation, of which more than 70% is produced by coal-based thermal power plants. Hydro-electricity contributes about 25%, and the remaining is mostly from nuclear power plants (NPPs). The problems associated with the use of coal are low calorific value and very high ash content. The ash content is as high as 55-60%, with an average value of about 35-40%. Further, most of the coal is located in the eastern parts of the country and requires transportation over long distances, mostly by trains, which run on diesel. About 70% oil is imported and is a big drain on India's hard currency. In the foreseeable future, there is no other option likely to be available, as the nuclear power programme envisages installing 20,000 MWe by the year 2020, when it will still be around 5% of the installed capacity. Hence, attempts are being made to reduce the adverse environmental and ecological impact of coal-fired power plants. The installed electricity generating capacity has to increase very rapidly (at present around 8-10% per annum), as India has one of the lowest per capita electricity consumptions. Therefore, the problems for the future are formidable from ecological, radio-ecological and pollution viewpoints. A similar situation exists in many developing countries of the region, including the People's Republic of China, where coal is used extensively. The paper highlights some of these problems with the data generated in the author's laboratory and gives a brief description of the solutions being attempted. The extent of global warming in this century will be determined by how developing countries like India manage their energy generation plans. Some of the recommendations have been implemented for new plants, and the situation in the new plants is much better. A few coal washeries have also been established. It will be quite some time before the steps to improve the environmental releases are implemented in older plants and several coal mines due to resource constraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15162853     DOI: 10.1016/S0265-931X(03)00183-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Radioact        ISSN: 0265-931X            Impact factor:   2.674


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of elemental and NROM/TENORM hazard potential from non-nuclear industries in North Sinai, Egypt.

Authors:  A F El-Mekawy; H M Badran; M K Seddeek; T Sharshar; T Elnimr
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  An analogy on assessment of urban air pollution in Turkey over the turn of the millennium (1992-2001).

Authors:  Hasan Goksel Ozdilek
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Occurrence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in air and soil surrounding a coal-fired thermal power plant in the south-west coast of India.

Authors:  Minal Milind Gune; Wan-Li Ma; Srimurali Sampath; Wenlong Li; Yi-Fan Li; Harikripa Narayana Udayashankar; Keshava Balakrishna; Zifeng Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Natural radionuclides in soil near a coal-fired power plant in the high background radiation area, South China.

Authors:  Guoqing Liu; Qi Luo; Mingxia Ding; Jiangping Feng
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Do coal consumption and industrial development increase environmental degradation in China and India?

Authors:  Muhammad Shahbaz; Sahbi Farhani; Ilhan Ozturk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Rock magnetic finger-printing of soil from a coal-fired thermal power plant.

Authors:  Minal Gune; B G Harshavardhana; K Balakrishna; H N Udayashankar; R Shankar; B R Manjunatha
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Non-invasive biomonitoring of mercury in birds near thermal power plants: lessons from Maharashtra, India.

Authors:  Sunidhi Thakur; Shalini Dhyani; Kavita Bramhanwade; Krishna Kumar Pandey; Naresh Bokade; Ramesh Janipella; Paras Pujari
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  COVID-19 driven changes in the air quality; a study of major cities in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh.

Authors:  Dipesh Kumar; Anil Kumar Singh; Vaibhav Kumar; R Poyoja; Ashok Ghosh; Bhaskar Singh
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  Quantification and Radiological Risk Estimation Due to the Presence of Natural Radionuclides in Maiganga Coal, Nigeria.

Authors:  Matthew Tikpangi Kolo; Mayeen Uddin Khandaker; Yusoff Mohd Amin; Wan Hasiah Binti Abdullah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Performance Evaluation of Pavement Geomaterials Stabilized with Pond Ash and Brick Kiln Dust Using Advanced Cyclic Triaxial Testing.

Authors:  Gaurav Gupta; Hemant Sood; Pardeep Gupta
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.