Literature DB >> 15162528

Postprocessing techniques of CT colonography in detection of colorectal carcinoma.

Ming-Yue Luo1, Hong Shan, Li-Qing Yao, Kang-Rong Zhou, Wen-Wei Liang.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the value of postprocessing techniques of CT colonography, including multiplanar reformation (MPR), virtual colonoscopy (VC), shaded surface display (SSD) and Raysum, in detection of colorectal carcinomas.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients with colorectal carcinoma underwent volume scanning with spiral CT. MPR, VC, SSD and Raysum images were obtained by using four kinds of postprocessing techniques in workstation. The results were comparatively analyzed according to circumferential extent, lesion length and pathology pattern of colorectal carcinomas. All diagnoses were proved pathologically and surgically.
RESULTS: The accuracy of circumferential extent of colorectal carcinoma determined by MPR, VC, SSD and Raysum was 100.0%, 82.8%, 79.7% and 79.7%, respectively. There was a significant statistical difference between MPR and VC. The consistent rate of lesion length was 89.1%, 76.6%, 95.3% and 100.0%, respectively. There was a statistical difference between VC and SSD. The accuracy of discriminating pathology pattern was 81.3%, 92.2%, 71.9% and 71.9%, respectively. There was a statistical difference between VC and SSD. MPR could determine accurately the circumference of colorectal carcinoma, Raysum could determine the length of lesion more precisely than SSD, VC was helpful in discriminating pathology patterns.
CONCLUSION: MPR, VC, SSD and Raysum have advantage and disadvantage in detection of colorectal carcinoma, use of these methods in combination can disclose the lesion more accurately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15162528      PMCID: PMC4572757          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i11.1574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  28 in total

1.  The end of barium enemas?

Authors:  R H Fletcher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening.

Authors:  C D Johnson; D A Ahlquist
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population.

Authors:  R M Summers; C D Johnson; L M Pusanik; J D Malley; A M Youssef; J E Reed
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: promise, polyps, politics.

Authors:  J T Ferrucci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study.

Authors:  G Spinzi; G Belloni; A Martegani; A Sangiovanni; C Del Favero; G Minoli
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yoshida; Yoshitaka Masutani; Peter MacEneaney; David T Rubin; Abraham H Dachman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Virtual colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy: a developing technology.

Authors:  R M Mendelson; N M Foster; J T Edwards; C J Wood; M S Rosenberg; G M Forbes
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2000-11-06       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study.

Authors:  R M Summers; C F Beaulieu; L M Pusanik; J D Malley; R B Jeffrey; D I Glazer; S Napel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.

Authors:  J G Fletcher; C D Johnson; T J Welch; R L MacCarty; D A Ahlquist; J E Reed; W S Harmsen; L A Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy).

Authors:  P Pescatore; T Glücker; J Delarive; R Meuli; D Pantoflickova; B Duvoisin; P Schnyder; A L Blum; G Dorta
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Colonography by CT, MRI and PET/CT combined with conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and staging.

Authors:  Long Sun; Hua Wu; Yong-Song Guan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.