BACKGROUND: Evidence is accumulating that several proteases are involved in prostate cancer progression. A locus which is often amplified in prostate cancer is the chromosomal region 20q13. Interestingly, one of the genes encoding the cysteine protease cathepsin X maps to this region. The aim of this study was to assess the expression pattern of cathepsin X in malignant and non-malignant prostatic tissue samples. METHODS: Matched malignant and non-malignant tissue specimens were obtained from 56 men after radical prostatectomy. Cathepsin X was quantified at both protein and mRNA levels using several detection methods: Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, quantitative RT-PCR, and in situ hybridization. Furthermore, genomic DNA was analyzed by PCR for possible gene amplification. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of radical prostatectomy specimens was performed utilizing a polyclonal antibody against human procathepsin X and revealed staining of acinar basal cells in normal prostate glands. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PINs) and prostate carcinomas stained highly positive for cathepsin X, showing a significant difference to the staining of normal prostate glands. In contrast, relatively weak and heterogeneous staining was observed for cathepsins F, B, and L. Up-regulation of cathepsin X at the protein level was confirmed by Western blotting. No statistically significant difference was observed at the mRNA level. PCR of genomic DNA revealed that cathepsin X up-regulation most likely occurs in the absence of genomic amplification. CONCLUSIONS: The high expression levels of cathepsin X both in PIN and invasive adenocarcinomas of the prostate suggest that cathepsin X may play a role in the early tumorigenesis of prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to define the utility of this cysteine protease as a diagnostic marker for the early detection of prostate cancer. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Evidence is accumulating that several proteases are involved in prostate cancer progression. A locus which is often amplified in prostate cancer is the chromosomal region 20q13. Interestingly, one of the genes encoding the cysteine protease cathepsin X maps to this region. The aim of this study was to assess the expression pattern of cathepsin X in malignant and non-malignant prostatic tissue samples. METHODS: Matched malignant and non-malignant tissue specimens were obtained from 56 men after radical prostatectomy. Cathepsin X was quantified at both protein and mRNA levels using several detection methods: Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, quantitative RT-PCR, and in situ hybridization. Furthermore, genomic DNA was analyzed by PCR for possible gene amplification. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of radical prostatectomy specimens was performed utilizing a polyclonal antibody against human procathepsin X and revealed staining of acinar basal cells in normal prostate glands. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PINs) and prostate carcinomas stained highly positive for cathepsin X, showing a significant difference to the staining of normal prostate glands. In contrast, relatively weak and heterogeneous staining was observed for cathepsins F, B, and L. Up-regulation of cathepsin X at the protein level was confirmed by Western blotting. No statistically significant difference was observed at the mRNA level. PCR of genomic DNA revealed that cathepsin X up-regulation most likely occurs in the absence of genomic amplification. CONCLUSIONS: The high expression levels of cathepsin X both in PIN and invasive adenocarcinomas of the prostate suggest that cathepsin X may play a role in the early tumorigenesis of prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to define the utility of this cysteine protease as a diagnostic marker for the early detection of prostate cancer. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Nicole D Staudt; Wilhelm K Aicher; Hubert Kalbacher; Stefan Stevanovic; Adriana K Carmona; Matthew Bogyo; Gerd Klein Journal: Haematologica Date: 2010-05-21 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Simon J Mountford; Bethany M Anderson; Bangyan Xu; Elean S V Tay; Monika Szabo; My-Linh Hoang; Jiayin Diao; Luigi Aurelio; Rhiannon I Campden; Erik Lindström; Erica K Sloan; Robin M Yates; Nigel W Bunnett; Philip E Thompson; Laura E Edgington-Mitchell Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Urša Pečar Fonović; Zala Jevnikar; Matija Rojnik; Bojan Doljak; Marko Fonović; Polona Jamnik; Janko Kos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-10 Impact factor: 3.240