Literature DB >> 1516201

Effect of intravenous adenosine infusion on myocardial perfusion and function. Hemodynamic/angiographic and scintigraphic study.

J D Ogilby1, A S Iskandrian, W J Untereker, J Heo, T N Nguyen, J Mercuro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine-induced hyperemia with dipyridamole or adenosine is an accepted method to diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD) and risk assessment. The mechanism of perfusion abnormality may be caused by disparate flow responses or coronary steal. This study examined the relation between 201Tl perfusion pattern and hemodynamic/angiographic changes during intravenous adenosine infusion. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients with suspected CAD underwent sequential hemodynamic, coronary arteriographic, and left ventriculographic studies simultaneously with 201Tl imaging during adenosine infusion (140 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 for 6 minutes). There were 33 patients with CAD and 12 patients without CAD. The 201Tl images (using single-photon emission computed tomography) were abnormal in 31 patients with CAD (sensitivity, 94%) and normal in the patients without CAD (specificity, 100%). In patients with and without CAD, there were significant increases in heart rate and cardiac output (p less than 0.0001) and decreases in systemic vascular resistance and blood pressure (p less than 0.0001). There was a 77 +/- 38% increase in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in normal subjects and a 125 +/- 83% increase in patients with CAD (p = 0.02). ST segment depression was observed in 11 patients with CAD (33%). In CAD patients, there was no change in percent diameter or area stenosis measured quantitatively during adenosine infusion. In 15 patients, contrast left ventriculography was repeated during adenosine infusion. In these patients, 201Tl perfusion defects were seen in 31 of 75 segments (41%) whereas only six of 75 segments (8%) developed regional wall motion abnormality (p less than 0.001); the remaining segments showed either no change or improved function. The left ventricular ejection fraction did not change significantly (73% versus 75%).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a disparity between the effects of adenosine on left ventricular perfusion and function; most patients with CAD have perfusion defects whereas the global and regional systolic function remains unchanged or improves. Diastolic left ventricular dysfunction is a probable mechanism of the increase in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1516201     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.86.3.887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of left ventricular function at rest and post-stress in patients with myocardial infarction: Evaluation with gated SPECT.

Authors:  C D Bavelaar-Croon; Y G America; D E Atsma; P Dibbets-Schneider; A H Zwinderman; M P Stokkel; E K Pauwels; E E van der Wall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Dipyridamole stress echocardiography: to be included in the Guidelines or to be abandoned from the clinical arena?

Authors:  Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Patient preparation for nuclear imaging: when should anti-ischemic medications be withheld?

Authors:  Sarkis B Baghdasarian; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Assessment of the arterial input function for estimation of coronary flow reserve by single photon emission computed tomography: comparison of two different approaches.

Authors:  Giovanni Storto; Andrea Soricelli; Teresa Pellegrino; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Validation of left ventricular volume measurements by gated SPECT 99mTc-labeled sestamibi imaging.

Authors:  A E Iskandrian; G Germano; W VanDecker; J D Ogilby; N Wolf; R Mintz; D S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Stroke complicating adenosine perfusion imaging.

Authors:  I A Khan; S A Samual
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 7.  Pharmacologic stress testing: mechanism of action, hemodynamic responses, and results in detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A S Iskandrian; M S Verani; J Heo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Are the differences between adenosine and dipyridamole clinically relevant?

Authors:  A S Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Myocardial perfusion stress protocols.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  The role of stress echocardiography versus stress perfusion: a view from the other side.

Authors:  F A Chaudhry
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.