Literature DB >> 15161391

On doing two things at once: IV. Necessary and sufficient conditions: Rejoinder to Lien, Proctor, and Ruthruff (2003).

Anthony G Greenwald1, Anthony G Greenwald1.   

Abstract

Four publications have demonstrated perfect timesharing of 1 simultaneous decisions. In all of these, (a). subjects were motivated to respond as quickly as possible, and with 1 exception that involved unusually extensive practice (E. Hazeltine, D. Teague, & R. B. Ivry, 2002, Experiment 4), (b). at least 1 of the 2 tasks was characterized by ideomotor (IM) compatibility, meaning that each task stimulus incorporated a component of the sensory feedback from its required response. Conclusions justified by these reports are that (a). the use of speed-stress instructions is necessary for perfect timesharing of 2 simultaneous decision tasks: (b). when both tasks are IM compatible, perfect timesharing requires little or no practice: (c). extensive practice is needed to achieve perfect timesharing when only 1 of the 2 tasks is IM compatible: and (d). very large amounts of practice can yield perfect timesharing of 2 decision tasks when neither is IM compatible. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15161391     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  1 in total

1.  Do small dual-task costs reflect ideomotor compatibility or the absence of crosstalk?

Authors:  Kimberly M Halvorson; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.