PURPOSE: Relationships between sociodemographic and health plan characteristics and health plan member satisfaction with prescription drug benefits were studied. METHODS: A survey was mailed in November 2002 to a stratified random sample of 14,141 people covered by a pharmacy benefit management company (PBM) who had made at least one prescription drug claim during the second quarter of 2002. Survey recipients had commercial health insurance and were 19-64 years of age. Participants were stratified by drug benefit plan design (two-tier copayment system, three-tier copayment system, coinsurance, or closed formulary). The survey contained 39 questions covering satisfaction with the prescription drug benefit, health-related attitudes and knowledge, and experience with the benefit. Predictors of satisfaction were examined by using logistic regression with probability weights. RESULTS: A total of 3819 surveys were returned (response rate, 27%). Respondents were more likely to be mail-order pharmacy users and less likely to be enrolled in a plan with a closed formulary. Out-of-pocket costs were viewed as the most important feature of the pharmacy benefit. In the logistic regression, higher copayments, coinsurance, closed formularies, intensive managed care, large health care premiums, a recent increase in copayments, and a recent denial of coverage were associated with lower satisfaction with the prescription drug benefit. Excellent health and use of mail-order pharmacy were associated with greater satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The extent to which health plan members served by a PBM had to share drug costs was the strongest determinant of satisfaction with the prescription drug benefit.
PURPOSE: Relationships between sociodemographic and health plan characteristics and health plan member satisfaction with prescription drug benefits were studied. METHODS: A survey was mailed in November 2002 to a stratified random sample of 14,141 people covered by a pharmacy benefit management company (PBM) who had made at least one prescription drug claim during the second quarter of 2002. Survey recipients had commercial health insurance and were 19-64 years of age. Participants were stratified by drug benefit plan design (two-tier copayment system, three-tier copayment system, coinsurance, or closed formulary). The survey contained 39 questions covering satisfaction with the prescription drug benefit, health-related attitudes and knowledge, and experience with the benefit. Predictors of satisfaction were examined by using logistic regression with probability weights. RESULTS: A total of 3819 surveys were returned (response rate, 27%). Respondents were more likely to be mail-order pharmacy users and less likely to be enrolled in a plan with a closed formulary. Out-of-pocket costs were viewed as the most important feature of the pharmacy benefit. In the logistic regression, higher copayments, coinsurance, closed formularies, intensive managed care, large health care premiums, a recent increase in copayments, and a recent denial of coverage were associated with lower satisfaction with the prescription drug benefit. Excellent health and use of mail-order pharmacy were associated with greater satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The extent to which health plan members served by a PBM had to share drug costs was the strongest determinant of satisfaction with the prescription drug benefit.
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Andrew J Karter; Wendy Dyer; Melissa Parker; Connie Uratsu; James Chan; O Kenrik Duru Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Cassondra J Marshall; Deanne Wiley; Christopher V Chau; Connie M Trinacty; J Frank Wharam; O Kenrik Duru; Andrew J Karter; Susan D Brown Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Anke-Peggy Holtorf; Carrie McAdam-Marx; David Schaaf; Benjamin Eng; Gary Oderda Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-02-25 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Christine L Tan; Mohamed A Hassali; Fahad Saleem; Asrul A Shafie; Hisham Aljadhey; Vincent B Gan Journal: Pharm Pract (Granada) Date: 2015-06-15