Literature DB >> 15160768

Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate gland: value of 12 versus 6 cores.

M J O'Connell1, C S Smith, P E Fitzpatrick, C O Keane, J M Fitzpatrick, M Behan, H F Fenlon, J G Murray.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect on prostate carcinoma detection of 12 versus 6 core biopsies at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), when all biopsies are taken from the lateral peripheral zone. This was a prospective study of 202 consecutive men, ages 51 to 81 years, referred for TRUS-guided biopsy of the prostate gland. All patients had prostate serum antigen levels higher than 4.0 ng/mL and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. In each case three biopsies were taken from the peripheral zones of the right and left lobes of the prostate. Biopsies were taken at the apex, midway between the apex and the base, and at the base. A second set of biopsies was taken from the same regions and analyzed separately. In total, twelve biopsies were taken. Note was subsequently made of additional carcinoma diagnosis increase in Gleason grade, and new diagnoses of carcinoma in the opposite side of the gland diagnosed on the second set of biopsies alone. Seventy-eight of the 202 men (38.6%) had prostatic carcinoma diagnosed on TRUS-guided biopsy. Of these 78 patients, six were diagnosed with malignancy based on the second set of biopsies alone, a 2.9% increase in the 202 patients, representing an increased yield of 8.3% (95% confidence interval, 5.3-28.6%). In nine cases (12.5%; 95% confidence interval, 6.2-22.9%), the Gleason tumor grade was increased on the second set of sextant biopsies; in an additional nine cases, carcinoma was detected in the opposite side of the gland. There were two complications (1%). A 12- versus six-core biopsy strategy for TRUS-guided biopsy of the prostate gland improves detection and histologic grading of prostate carcinoma. The added benefit of additional biopsies was lower in this series than in some prior studies using extensive biopsy protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15160768     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-003-0089-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  9 in total

Review 1.  A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Hilco van Moerkerk; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Ferdinand Frauscher; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A Study of Needle Image Artifact Localization in Confirmation Imaging of MRI-guided Robotic Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Sang-Eun Song; Nathan B Cho; Iulian I Iordachita; Peter Guion; Gabor Fichtinger; Louis L Whitcomb
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom       Date:  2011-08-15

3.  The impact of core biopsy fragmentation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Reis; José Alberto Salvo Reinato; Daniel Carlos Silva; Wagner Eduardo Matheus; Fernandes Denardi; Ubirajara Ferreira
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Evaluating the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial High Grade Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in 10 international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Donna P Ankerst; Andreas Boeck; Stephen J Freedland; J Stephen Jones; Angel M Cronin; Monique J Roobol; Jonas Hugosson; Michael W Kattan; Eric A Klein; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Jenny Donovan; Dipen J Parekh; Helmut Klocker; Wolfgang Horninger; Amine Benchikh; Gilles Salama; Arnauld Villers; Daniel M Moreira; Fritz H Schröder; Hans Lilja; Andrew J Vickers; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Prostate biopsy after ano-rectal resection: value of CT-guided trans-gluteal biopsy.

Authors:  Colin P Cantwell; Peter F Hahn; Debra A Gervais; Peter R Mueller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Single positive core prostate cancer in a 12-core transrectal biopsy scheme: clinicopathological implications compared with multifocal counterpart.

Authors:  Hong Jae Ahn; Young Hwii Ko; Hoon Ah Jang; Sung Gu Kang; Seok Ho Kang; Hong Seok Park; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Jun Cheon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

Review 7.  Transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Jack Power; Mark Murphy; Barry Hutchinson; Daragh Murphy; Michelle McNicholas; Kiaran O'Malley; John Murray; Carmel Cronin
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-04-25

8.  Touch imprint cytology of prostate core needle biopsy specimens: A useful method for immediate reporting of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Berna Aytac; Fatma Oz Atalay; Hakan Vuruskan; Gulaydan Filiz
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Transperineal ultrasound-guided 12-core prostate biopsy: an extended approach to diagnose transition zone prostate tumors.

Authors:  Ming-Hua Yao; Li-Ling Zou; Rong Wu; Le-Hang Guo; Guang Xu; Juan Xie; Pei Li; Shuai Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.