OBJECTIVES: To examine agreement between end-stage ALS patients and their family caregivers on indicators of physical and psychological status at the end of life. METHODS: Patient-caregiver pairs completed monthly interviews in patient homes. Patients were asked to rate their current pain, energy, suffering, depression, control over ALS, optimism, interest in hastened death, weariness from ALS, will to live, and how burdened they thought caregivers were on Visual Analogue Scales. Caregivers completed identical ratings of patients as well as a measure of their own burden. Both independently completed the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Rev. (ALSFRS-R), a measure of patient disability and physical function. RESULTS: A total of 69 patient-caregiver pairs participated. For measures of physical function, kappa ranged from 0.49 to 0.83, indicating moderate to excellent agreement. Patient and caregiver composite ALSFRS-R scores were highly correlated (r = 0.92, p < 0.001). Agreement between patients and caregivers was high for ratings of patient pain, control over ALS, optimism, and will to live, and this level of agreement remained high over multiple assessments. In pairwise analyses, caregivers rated patients as having less energy, greater suffering, and greater weariness than patients indicated for themselves, whereas patients rated caregivers as more burdened than caregivers reported for themselves. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers can accurately report information about a patient's physical function at the end of life. However, patients and caregivers each overestimated the psychosocial impact of the disease on the other.
OBJECTIVES: To examine agreement between end-stage ALSpatients and their family caregivers on indicators of physical and psychological status at the end of life. METHODS:Patient-caregiver pairs completed monthly interviews in patient homes. Patients were asked to rate their current pain, energy, suffering, depression, control over ALS, optimism, interest in hastened death, weariness from ALS, will to live, and how burdened they thought caregivers were on Visual Analogue Scales. Caregivers completed identical ratings of patients as well as a measure of their own burden. Both independently completed the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Rev. (ALSFRS-R), a measure of patient disability and physical function. RESULTS: A total of 69 patient-caregiver pairs participated. For measures of physical function, kappa ranged from 0.49 to 0.83, indicating moderate to excellent agreement. Patient and caregiver composite ALSFRS-R scores were highly correlated (r = 0.92, p < 0.001). Agreement between patients and caregivers was high for ratings of patientpain, control over ALS, optimism, and will to live, and this level of agreement remained high over multiple assessments. In pairwise analyses, caregivers rated patients as having less energy, greater suffering, and greater weariness than patients indicated for themselves, whereas patients rated caregivers as more burdened than caregivers reported for themselves. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers can accurately report information about a patient's physical function at the end of life. However, patients and caregivers each overestimated the psychosocial impact of the disease on the other.
Authors: S M Albert; J G Rabkin; M L Del Bene; T Tider; I O'Sullivan; L P Rowland; H Mitsumoto Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-07-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Rachel Evans; Michael A Catapano; Dina Brooks; Roger S Goldstein; Monica Avendano Journal: Can Respir J Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: Daniel P Sulmasy; Mark T Hughes; Richard E Thompson; Alan B Astrow; Peter B Terry; Joan Kub; Marie T Nolan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Robert V O'Toole; Renan C Castillo; Andrew N Pollak; Ellen J MacKenzie; Michael J Bosse Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Susan K Baxter; Wendy O Baird; Sue Thompson; Stephen M Bianchi; Stephen J Walters; Ellen Lee; Sam H Ahmedzai; Alison Proctor; Pamela J Shaw; Christopher J McDermott Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2013-11-16 Impact factor: 2.947