Literature DB >> 15159424

Social responses without early experience: Australian brush-turkey chicks use specific visual cues to aggregate with conspecifics.

Ann Göth1, Christopher S Evans.   

Abstract

Almost all birds depend upon early experience with adults and siblings to learn recognition cues. Megapodes, such as the Australian brush-turkey (Alectura lathami), have evolved a very different life history. Eggs are incubated in mounds of decaying organic material. Chicks hatch asynchronously and receive no parental care, so imprinting cannot occur. Nevertheless, chicks subsequently form groups with similar-aged conspecifics. We explored the perceptual basis of this aggregation response, focussing on likely visual cues, such as pecking movements and body colour. Experiments were conducted under naturalistic conditions in a large aviary, using realistic robot models and colour filters. The robots successfully evoked a range of social responses resembling those of a live companion. Aggregation depended upon both behaviour and morphology. Simultaneous choice tests revealed that brush-turkey chicks preferred a pecking robot over either a static model or a scanning robot, suggesting that responsiveness depends upon particular movement patterns. In addition, chicks were sensitive to changes in appearance but only those that affected radiance at short wavelengths. The mechanism underlying social aggregation after hatching hence involves relatively specific cues. This perceptual bias seems to be largely experience independent and may exploit attributes to which potential predators are insensitive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15159424     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Ultraviolet visual sensitivity in three avian lineages: paleognaths, parrots, and passerines.

Authors:  Zachary Aidala; Leon Huynen; Patricia L R Brennan; Jacob Musser; Andrew Fidler; Nicola Chong; Gabriel E Machovsky Capuska; Michael G Anderson; Amanda Talaba; David Lambert; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Closed-loop control of zebrafish response using a bioinspired robotic-fish in a preference test.

Authors:  Vladislav Kopman; Jeffrey Laut; Giovanni Polverino; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Sexual imprinting misguides species recognition in a facultative interspecific brood parasite.

Authors:  Michael D Sorenson; Mark E Hauber; Scott R Derrickson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Fish and robots swimming together in a water tunnel: robot color and tail-beat frequency influence fish behavior.

Authors:  Giovanni Polverino; Paul Phamduy; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Robots in the service of animal behavior.

Authors:  Barrett A Klein; Joey Stein; Ryan C Taylor
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2012-09-01

6.  The Logic of Interactive Biorobotics.

Authors:  Edoardo Datteri
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.