Literature DB >> 15159320

Results of a phase I multiple-dose clinical study of ursodeoxycholic Acid.

Lisa M Hess1, Mary F Krutzsch, Jose Guillen, H-H Sherry Chow, Janine Einspahr, A K Batta, Gerald Salen, Mary E Reid, David L Earnest, David S Alberts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The hydrophilic bile acid, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), may indirectly protect against colon carcinogenesis by decreasing the overall proportion of the more hydrophobic bile acids, such as deoxycholic acid (DCA), in aqueous phase stool. In the AOM rat model, treatment with UDCA resulted in a significant decrease in adenoma formation and colorectal cancer. It was hypothesized that there is a dose-response relationship between treatment with the more hydrophilic bile acid, UDCA, and a reduction in the proportion of the more hydrophobic bile acid, DCA, in the aqueous stool phase, suggesting the potential of UDCA as a chemopreventive agent.
METHODS: Eighteen participants were randomized to 300, 600, or 900 mg/day UDCA for 21 days in this multiple-dose, double-blinded study. Seventy-two-hour stool samples were collected pretreatment and on days 18-20 of UDCA treatment for bile acid measurements. Pharmacokinetics were performed and blood bile acids were measured at days 1 and 21 of UDCA treatment.
RESULTS: There were no serious adverse events associated with UDCA treatment. There was a dose-response increase in the posttreatment to baseline ratio of UDCA to DCA from the 300 mg/day to the 600 mg/day group, but not between the 600 and the 900 mg/day groups, in both aqueous and solid phase stool. This posttreatment increase was statistically significant in aqueous phase stool for the 300 and 600 mg/day treatment groups (P = 0.038 and P = 0.014, respectively), but was only marginally significant in the 900 mg/day treatment group (P = 0.057). Following the first dose administration, a dose-dependent increase in plasma ursodeoxycholic concentrations was observed in fasting subjects; however, when these levels were measured postprandially following 3 weeks of treatment, the areas under the plasma concentration-time profile (AUC) were not statistically different and remained relatively unchanged over time.
CONCLUSIONS: UDCA treatment did not decrease the quantity of DCA in fecal water or solids; however, it did decrease the proportion of DCA in fecal water and solids in relation to UDCA. Thus, 3 weeks of UDCA treatment resulted in an overall increase in hydrophilicity of bile acids in the aqueous phase stool, with a peak effect observed with a daily dose of 600 mg/day. Much larger studies are needed to determine the effect of ursodeoxycholic administration on deoxycholic concentration, overall hydrophilicity of stool bile acids, and the long-term effects on intermediate biomarkers of cellular damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15159320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  14 in total

1.  Combinatorial chemoprevention reveals a novel smoothened-independent role of GLI1 in esophageal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Sumera Rizvi; Cathrine J Demars; Andrea Comba; Vladimir G Gainullin; Zaheer Rizvi; Luciana L Almada; Kenneth Wang; Gwen Lomberk; Martin E Fernández-Zapico; Navtej S Buttar
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Risk modification of colorectal adenoma by CYP7A1 polymorphisms and the role of bile acid metabolism in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Betsy C Wertheim; Jeffrey W Smith; Changming Fang; David S Alberts; Peter Lance; Patricia A Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-11-04

3.  Unusual binding of ursodeoxycholic acid to ileal bile acid binding protein: role in activation of FXRα.

Authors:  Changming Fang; Fabian V Filipp; Jeffrey W Smith
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 5.922

4.  Gender modifies the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in a randomized controlled trial in colorectal adenoma patients.

Authors:  Patricia A Thompson; Betsy C Wertheim; Denise J Roe; Erin L Ashbeck; Elizabeth T Jacobs; Peter Lance; María Elena Martínez; David S Alberts
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2009-12-01

5.  Association between Circulating Vitamin D Metabolites and Fecal Bile Acid Concentrations.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Jacobs; Mark R Haussler; David S Alberts; Lindsay N Kohler; Peter Lance; María Elena Martínez; Denise J Roe; Peter W Jurutka
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-05-02

6.  Ursodeoxycholic acid attenuates colonic epithelial secretory function.

Authors:  Orlaith B Kelly; Magdalena S Mroz; Joseph B J Ward; Carolina Colliva; Michael Scharl; Roberto Pellicciari; John F Gilmer; Padraic G Fallon; Alan F Hofmann; Aldo Roda; Frank E Murray; Stephen J Keely
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Intestinal bile acid physiology and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Olga Martinez-Augustin; Fermin Sanchez de Medina
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Contribution of the 7β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from Ruminococcus gnavus N53 to ursodeoxycholic acid formation in the human colon.

Authors:  Ja-Young Lee; Hisashi Arai; Yusuke Nakamura; Satoru Fukiya; Masaru Wada; Atsushi Yokota
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 5.922

9.  A Systems Model for Ursodeoxycholic Acid Metabolism in Healthy and Patients With Primary Biliary Cirrhosis.

Authors:  P Zuo; R L Dobbins; R L O'Connor-Semmes; M A Young
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2016-08-18

10.  Long-term differential changes in mouse intestinal metabolomics after γ and heavy ion radiation exposure.

Authors:  Amrita K Cheema; Shubhankar Suman; Prabhjit Kaur; Rajbir Singh; Albert J Fornace; Kamal Datta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.