Literature DB >> 15159151

Effects of substrate loading rate on biofilm structure.

Suren Wijeyekoon1, Takashi Mino, Hiroyasu Satoh, Tomonori Matsuo.   

Abstract

The effects of substrate surface loading rate on biofilm growth and structure were investigated by chemical, biochemical and microscopic methods. Three tubular reactors were operated at equal C:N ratio of 0.1, with substrate loading rates of 1.2, 0.6 and 0.3g-C/m(2)/day. Substrate loading positively influenced the biofilm growth rate. Denser biofilms with lower porosities were formed at higher substrate loading. Slowly growing biofilms having porous structures were found to have higher specific activities. Nitrification was suppressed under the higher substrate loading conditions even at the equal C:N ratio of 0.1, thus proving that the spatial competition between nitrifiers and heterotrophs as one limiting criteria for stable nitrification. The spatial organization of the ammonia oxidizers was biofilm structure related. The strain variability of ammonia oxidizers was substrate loading dependent. These findings suggest that substrate loading is a key parameter in determining biofilm structure and function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15159151     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  12 in total

1.  Evolution of diversity in spatially structured Escherichia coli populations.

Authors:  José Miguel Ponciano; Hyun-Joon La; Paul Joyce; Larry J Forney
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Nutrient capture and recycling by periphyton attached to modified agrowaste carriers.

Authors:  Juanjuan Wan; Xuemei Liu; Chenxi Wu; Yonghong Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Integration of biofiltration and advanced oxidation processes for tertiary treatment of an oil refinery wastewater aiming at water reuse.

Authors:  A A Nogueira; J P Bassin; A C Cerqueira; M Dezotti
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Biological filtration limits carbon availability and affects downstream biofilm formation and community structure.

Authors:  Chee Meng Pang; Wen-Tso Liu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Setup and validation of flow cell systems for biofouling simulation in industrial settings.

Authors:  Joana S Teodósio; Manuel Simões; Manuel A Alves; Luís F Melo; Filipe J Mergulhão
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-26

6.  Nitrifying biofilms deprived of organic carbon show higher functional resilience to increases in carbon supply.

Authors:  Sharada Navada; Maja F Knutsen; Ingrid Bakke; Olav Vadstein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Culture of attached and suspended Rhodopseudomonas faecalis in the presence of decomposing fish feed.

Authors:  Xiaodong Wang; Xingguo Liu; Shimin Lu; Chong Liu; Zhaojun Gu; Xianlei Zeng; Qi Ni
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Recombinant protein expression in biofilms.

Authors:  Alexandra Soares; Ana Azevedo; Luciana C Gomes; Filipe J Mergulhão
Journal:  AIMS Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-27

9.  Prosthesis design of animal models of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ke Jie; Peng Deng; Houran Cao; Wenjun Feng; Jinlun Chen; Yirong Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Low-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Characteristics of Biofilm Development Process.

Authors:  Yajun Zhang; Yusheng Lin; Xin Lv; Aoshu Xu; Caihui Feng; Jun Lin
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.